Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25110928›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Comparative analyses between retained introns and constitutively spliced introns in Arabidopsis thaliana using random forest and support vector machine.

Rui Mao, Praveen Kumar Raj Kumar, Cheng Guo, Yang Zhang, Chun Liang

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Function of Cajal Bodies in Nuclear RNA Retention inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Modern Approaches for Transcriptome Analyses in Plants.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Rui MaoCollege of Mechanical and Electronic Engineering, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Shaanxi, China; College of Information Engineering, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Shaanxi, China; Department of Biology, Miami University, Oxford, Ohio, United States of America.
Praveen Kumar Raj KumarDepartment of Biology, Miami University, Oxford, Ohio, United States of America.
Cheng GuoDepartment of Biology, Miami University, Oxford, Ohio, United States of America.
Yang ZhangCollege of Mechanical and Electronic Engineering, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Shaanxi, China; College of Information Engineering, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Shaanxi, China.
Chun LiangDepartment of Biology, Miami University, Oxford, Ohio, United States of America; Department of Computer Sciences and Software Engineering, Miami University, Oxford, Ohio, United States of America.

Funding

In silico Exploration of Alternative Polyadenylation Using Next-Generation SequenR15GM094732 · NIGMS · MIAMI UNIVERSITY OXFORD · PI KARRO, JOHN E., LI, QINGSHUN Q · 2011 to 2011
$284k
NIGMS NIH HHS 1R15GM094732-01A1NIGMS NIH HHS R15 GM094732
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One of the important modes of pre-mRNA post-transcriptional modification is alternative splicing. Alternative splicing allows creation of many distinct mature mRNA transcripts from a single gene by utilizing different splice sites. In plants like Arabidopsis thaliana, the most common type of alternative splicing is intron retention. Many studies in the past focus on positional distribution of retained introns (RIs) among different genic regions and their expression regulations, while little systematic classification of RIs from constitutively spliced introns (CSIs) has been conducted using machine learning approaches. We used random forest and support vector machine (SVM) with radial basis kernel function (RBF) to differentiate these two types of introns in Arabidopsis. By comparing coordinates of introns of all annotated mRNAs from TAIR10, we obtained our high-quality experimental data. To distinguish RIs from CSIs, We investigated the unique characteristics of RIs in comparison with CSIs and finally extracted 37 quantitative features: local and global nucleotide sequence features of introns, frequent motifs, the signal strength of splice sites, and the similarity between sequences of introns and their flanking regions. We demonstrated that our proposed feature extraction approach was more accurate in effectively classifying RIs from CSIs in comparison with other four approaches. The optimal penalty parameter C and the RBF kernel parameter [Formula: see text] in SVM were set based on particle swarm optimization algorithm (PSOSVM). Our classification performance showed F-Measure of 80.8% (random forest) and 77.4% (PSOSVM). Not only the basic sequence features and positional distribution characteristics of RIs were obtained, but also putative regulatory motifs in intron splicing were predicted based on our feature extraction approach. Clearly, our study will facilitate a better understanding of underlying mechanisms involved in intron retention.

Indexed as

RNA SplicingSupport Vector MachineArabidopsisComputational BiologyExonsIntronsRNA, MessengerRNA, Messenger

Identifiers

PMID25110928
PMCPMC4128822

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.