Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25110703›Full record

ReviewBioMed research international2014

Current evidence regarding prophylactic antibiotics in head and neck and maxillofacial surgery.

Kilian Kreutzer, Katharina Storck, Jochen Weitz

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BioMed research international, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04989127 (Comparison The Postoperative Effects Of Local Antibiotic Versus Systemic Antibiotic With The Use Of Platelet Rich Fibrin On The Mandibular Third Molar Surgery), which is not on this map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04989127 completednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Comparison The Postoperative Effects Of Local Antibiotic Versus Systemic Antibiotic With The Use Of Platelet Rich Fibrin On The Mandibular Third Molar Surgery

TypeobservationalSponsorCeren Melahat DonmezerRan2019 to 2021Enrolled75ConditionsImpacted Wisdom ToothArmsDiagnosis, traditional osteotomies, Platelet Rich Fibrin, Antibiotics, Penicillin, Analgesic
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Tissue engineering of human ear pinna.Cell and tissue banking · 2022
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Postoperative antibiotic prophylaxis in clean-contaminated head and neck oncologic surgery: a retrospective cohort study.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2016
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kilian KreutzerDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Technische Universität München, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Ismaninger Straße 22, 81675 Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0581-4137
Katharina StorckDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Technische Universität München, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Ismaninger Straße 22, 81675 Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8953-0785
Jochen WeitzDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Technische Universität München, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Ismaninger Straße 22, 81675 Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5765-5193

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antibiotic prophylaxis is commonly used to decrease the rate of infections in head and neck surgery. The aim of this paper is to present the available evidence regarding the application of antibiotic prophylaxis in surgical procedures of the head and neck region in healthy patients. A systemic literature review based on Medline and Embase databases was performed. All reviews and meta-analyses based on RCTs in English from 2000 to 2013 were included. Eight out of 532 studies fulfilled all requirements. Within those, only seven different operative procedures were analyzed. Evidence exists for the beneficial use of prophylactic antibiotics for tympanostomy, orthognathic surgery, and operative tooth extractions. Unfortunately, little high-level evidence exists regarding the use of prophylactic antibiotics in head and neck surgery. In numerous cases, no clear benefit of antibiotic prophylaxis has been shown, particularly considering their potential adverse side effects. Antibiotics are often given unnecessarily and are administered too late and for too long. Furthermore, little research has been performed on the large number of routine cases in the above-mentioned areas of specialization within the last few years, although questions arising with respect to the treatment of high-risk patients or of specific infections are discussed on a broad base.

Indexed as

Antibiotic ProphylaxisSurgery, OralAnti-Bacterial AgentsDental ImplantsHumansTooth ExtractionAnti-Bacterial AgentsDental Implants

Identifiers

PMID25110703
PMCPMC4119728

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.