Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25110666›Full record

ArticleBioMed research international2014

Evaluation of growth patterns and body composition in C57Bl/6J mice using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry.

Sara Gargiulo, Matteo Gramanzini, Rosario Megna, Adelaide Greco, Sandra Albanese, Claudio Manfredi, Arturo Brunetti

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BioMed research international, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 91 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. CORP: In vivo muscle strength-perspectives on the design and interpretation of preclinical animal studies.American journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Body Length as an Objective Marker of Time to Wean in Laboratory Mice.Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sara GargiuloInstitute of Biostructures and Bioimages of National Council of Research of Naples, Via De Amicis 95, 80145 Naples, Italy ; CEINGE-Biotecnologie Avanzate Scarl, Via G. Salvatore 486, 80145 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1894-1047
Matteo GramanziniInstitute of Biostructures and Bioimages of National Council of Research of Naples, Via De Amicis 95, 80145 Naples, Italy ; CEINGE-Biotecnologie Avanzate Scarl, Via G. Salvatore 486, 80145 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5645-1527
Rosario MegnaInstitute of Biostructures and Bioimages of National Council of Research of Naples, Via De Amicis 95, 80145 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5716-2137
Adelaide GrecoCEINGE-Biotecnologie Avanzate Scarl, Via G. Salvatore 486, 80145 Naples, Italy ; Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, Federico II University, Via Pansini 5, 80131 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6841-1963
Sandra AlbaneseCEINGE-Biotecnologie Avanzate Scarl, Via G. Salvatore 486, 80145 Naples, Italy ; Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, Federico II University, Via Pansini 5, 80131 Naples, Italy.
Claudio ManfrediDepartment of Neurosciences, Reproductive and Odontostomatological Sciences, Federico II University, Via Pansini 5, 80131 Naples, Italy.
Arturo BrunettiCEINGE-Biotecnologie Avanzate Scarl, Via G. Salvatore 486, 80145 Naples, Italy ; Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, Federico II University, Via Pansini 5, 80131 Naples, Italy.
Federico II University Hospital · ITCeinge Biotecnologie Avanzate (Italy) · ITInstitute of Biostructure and Bioimaging · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The normal growth pattern of female C57BL/6J mice, from 5 to 30 weeks of age, has been investigated in a longitudinal study. Weight, body surface area (BS), and body mass index (BMI) were evaluated in forty mice. Lean mass and fat mass, bone mineral content (BMC), and bone mineral density (BMD) were monitored by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA). Weight and BS increased linearly (16.15 ± 0.64-27.64 ± 1.42 g; 51.13 ± 0.74-79.57 ± 2.15 cm(2), P < 0.01), more markedly from 5 to 9 weeks of age (P < 0.001). BMD showed a peak at 17 weeks (0.0548 ± 0.0011 g/cm(2) ∗ m, P < 0.01). Lean mass showed an evident gain at 9 (15.8 ± 0.8 g, P < 0.001) and 25 weeks (20.5 ± 0.3 g, P < 0.01), like fat mass from 13 to 17 weeks (2.0 ± 0.4-3.6 ± 0.7 g, P < 0.01). BMI and lean mass index (LMI) reached the highest value at 21 weeks (3.57 ± 0.02-0.284 ± 0.010 g/cm(2), resp.), like fat mass index (FMI) at 17 weeks (0.057 ± 0.009 g/cm(2)) (P < 0.01). BMI, weight, and BS showed a moderate positive correlation (0.45-0.85) with lean mass from 5 to 21 weeks. Mixed linear models provided a good prediction for lean mass, fat mass, and BMD. This study may represent a baseline reference for a future comparison of wild-type C57BL/6J mice with models of altered growth.

Indexed as

Body CompositionGrowth and DevelopmentAbsorptiometry, PhotonAnimalsBone DensityConfidence IntervalsFemaleMice, Inbred C57BLRegression AnalysisStatistics, Nonparametric

Identifiers

PMID25110666
PMCPMC4119710
OpenAlexW2036861129

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.