Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25110478›Full record

ArticleAllergy, asthma, and clinical immunology : official journal of the Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology2014

Children under 15 kg with food allergy may be at risk of having epinephrine auto-injectors administered into bone.

Laura Kim, Immaculate Fp Nevis, Gina Tsai, Arunmozhi Dominic, Ryan Potts, Jack Chiu, Harold L Kim

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Allergy, asthma, and clinical immunology : official journal of the Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Needle-to-bone safety margin of adrenaline auto-injectors in Japanese children: Impact of injection site variation.Pediatric allergy and immunology : official publication of the European Society of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Anaphylaxis.Allergy, asthma, and clinical immunology : official journal of the Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2024
    Review
  4. Review
  5. International recommendations on epinephrine auto-injector doses often differ from standard weight-based guidance: a review and clinical proposals.Allergy, asthma, and clinical immunology : official journal of the Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2022
    Review
  6. CSACI position statement: transition recommendations on existing epinephrine autoinjectors.Allergy, asthma, and clinical immunology : official journal of the Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2021
    Article
  7. Recent update on the management of anaphylaxis.Clinical and experimental emergency medicine · 2021
    Article
  8. The pharmacokinetics of epinephrine/adrenaline autoinjectors.Allergy, asthma, and clinical immunology : official journal of the Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2021
    Review
  9. Review
  10. [Paediatric Life Support].Notfall & rettungsmedizin · 2021
    Review
  11. Clinical Management of Infant Anaphylaxis.Journal of asthma and allergy · 2021
    Review
  12. Epinephrine auto-injector needle length: The impact of winter clothing.Allergy, asthma, and clinical immunology : official journal of the Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2020
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Anaphylaxis.Allergy, asthma, and clinical immunology : official journal of the Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2018
    Review
  15. Unintentional injection to the bone with a pediatric epinephrine auto-injector.Allergy, asthma, and clinical immunology : official journal of the Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2018
    Article
  16. Observational
  17. Anaphylaxis in children.Current opinion in pediatrics · 2016
    Review
  18. Do epinephrine auto-injectors have an unsuitable needle length in children and adolescents at risk for anaphylaxis from food allergy?Allergy, asthma, and clinical immunology : official journal of the Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2016
    Article
  19. CSACI position statement: epinephrine auto-injectors and children < 15 kg.Allergy, asthma, and clinical immunology : official journal of the Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2015
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Laura KimDepartment of Anatomy and Cell Biology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Immaculate Fp NevisMichael D. DeGroote School of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada ; Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.
Gina TsaiSchulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.
Arunmozhi DominicSchulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.
Ryan PottsDepartment of Biology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
Jack ChiuSchulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.
Harold L KimMichael D. DeGroote School of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada ; Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada ; 525 Belmont Avenue West, Suite 205, Kitchener N2M 5E2, Ontario, Canada.
Western University · CAMcGill University · CAMcMaster University · CAUniversity of Waterloo · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Epipen® Jr and Allerject® 0.15 mg are currently the most commonly prescribed epinephrine auto-injectors (EAIs) for the management of anaphylaxis in pediatric patients in North America and Canada. To ensure rapid absorption, it should be administered intramuscularly into the anterolateral aspect of the thigh. We examined whether the 12.7-mm needle length of the Epipen® Jr and Allerject® 0.15 mg is adequate for delivering epinephrine intramuscularly in pediatric patients who weighed <15 kg.

methodsConsecutive pediatric patients with food allergy weighing <15 kg who required an EAI were included. Ultrasounds of the mid-anterolateral thigh were performed under minimal (min) and maximal (max) pressure. Skin-to-muscle depth (STMD) and skin-to-bone depth (STBD) measurements were completed. Baseline characteristics were compared between patients with a STBDmax <12.7 mm vs. ≥12.7 mm. Linear regression including variables such as age, sex, body mass index (BMI) and race was performed. The proportion of patients with a STBDmax <12.7 mm was compared in those weighing <10 kg vs. 10-14.9 kg.

resultsOne hundred patients were included; 29 (29%) had STBDmax <12.7 mm. Height (p = 0.02) and weight (p = 0.0002) differed significantly between the two groups. Approximately 19% of those weighing 10-14.9 kg and 60% of those <10 kg had a STBDmax <12.7 mm. In the multivariable regression analysis, BMI was found to be a significant predictor of STBDmax.

conclusionsA large proportion of children <15 kg prescribed an EAI is at risk of having the auto-injector administered into bone. Since alternative EAIs with shorter needle lengths are not currently available, EAIs should be prescribed with appropriate counselling in this population.

Indexed as

AnaphylaxisAuto-injectorEpinephrineFood allergyNeedle lengthPediatricSkin-to-bone depth

Identifiers

PMID25110478
PMCPMC4126643
OpenAlexW2106337451

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.