Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25109780›Full record

ReviewBiological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society2015

Design principles and developmental mechanisms underlying retinal mosaics.

Benjamin E Reese, Patrick W Keeley

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 78 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Connectome-driven neural inventory of a complete visual system.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. AMIGO1 Promotes Axon Growth and Territory Matching in the Retina.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Benjamin E ReeseNeuroscience Research Institute, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106-5060, U.S.A.
Patrick W KeeleyNeuroscience Research Institute, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106-5060, U.S.A.
University of California, Santa Barbara · US

Funding

Development of Retinal Bipolar CellsR01EY019968 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA BARBARA · PI REESE, BENJAMIN E · 2010 to 2023
$4.9M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY019968
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most structures within the central nervous system (CNS) are composed of different types of neuron that vary in both number and morphology, but relatively little is known about the interplay between these two features, i.e. about the population dynamics of a given cell type. How such arrays of neurons are distributed within a structure, and how they differentiate their dendrites relative to each other, are issues that have recently drawn attention in the invertebrate nervous system, where the genetic and molecular underpinnings of these organizing principles are being revealed in exquisite detail. The retina is one of the few locations where these principles have been extensively studied in the vertebrate CNS, indeed, where the design principles of 'mosaic regularity' and 'uniformity of coverage' were first explicitly defined, quantified, and related to each other. Recent studies have revealed a number of genes that influence the formation of these histotypical features in the retina, including homologues of those invertebrate genes, although close inspection reveals that they do not always mediate comparable developmental processes nor elucidate fundamental design principles. The present review considers just how pervasive these features of 'mosaic regularity' and 'uniform dendritic coverage' are within the mammalian retina, discussing the means by which such features can be assessed in the mature and developing nervous system and examining the limitations associated with those assessments. We then address the extent to which these two design principles co-exist within different populations of neurons, and how they are achieved during development. Finally, we consider the neural phenotypes obtained in mutant nervous systems, to address whether a prospective gene of interest underlies those very design principles.

Indexed as

AnimalsCentral Nervous SystemInvertebratesMutationRetinaVertebratesautocorrelationcoveragedendritic fieldeffective radiusnearest neighbourpacking factorpatterningregularitytilingVoronoi domain

Identifiers

PMID25109780
PMCPMC4320990
OpenAlexW1533904168

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.