ArticleBiomaterials2014
Proliferation and enrichment of CD133(+) glioblastoma cancer stem cells on 3D chitosan-alginate scaffolds.
Article in Biomaterials, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
55 citing papers in PubMed, 122 citations in OpenAlex.
- MiRNA delivery systems in cancer stem cell therapy: exosomes versus chitosan nanoparticles.Stem cell research & therapy · 2025Review
- Review
- mTOR Pathway Inhibition, Anticancer Activity and In Silico Calculations of Novel Hydrazone Derivatives in Two- and Three-Dimensional Cultured Type 1 Endometrial Cancer Cells.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- DNA hydrogels and their derivatives in biomedical engineering applications.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2024Review
- Preclinical Models and Technologies in Glioblastoma Research: Evolution, Current State, and Future Avenues.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Application of three-dimensional cell culture technology in screening anticancer drugs.Biotechnology letters · 2023Review
- Three-Dimensional Cell Cultures: The Bridge between In Vitro and In Vivo Models.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Recent Advances on Cell Culture Platforms for In Vitro Drug Screening and Cell Therapies: From Conventional to Microfluidic Strategies.Advanced healthcare materials · 2023Review
- Biomaterial-basedCancer pathogenesis and therapy · 2023Review
- Characterization of 3D-Bioprinted In Vitro Lung Cancer Models Using RNA-Sequencing Techniques.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Biophysical cues of in vitro biomaterials-based artificial extracellular matrix guide cancer cell plasticity.Materials today. Bio · 2023Article
- Assessing Polysaccharides/Aloe Vera-Based Hydrogels for Tumor Spheroid Formation.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- High-Throughput Dispensing of Viscous Solutions for Biomedical Applications.Micromachines · 2022Article
- Article
- Current Advances in 3D Bioprinting for Cancer Modeling and Personalized Medicine.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Global research trends and hotspots on glioma stem cells.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- 3D Cell Culture Systems: Tumor Application, Advantages, and Disadvantages.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- Surface acoustic wave (SAW) techniques in tissue engineering.Cell and tissue research · 2021Review
- Progress in mimicking brain microenvironments to understand and treat neurological disorders.APL bioengineering · 2021Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Emerging evidence implicates cancer stem cells (CSCs) as primary determinants of the clinical behavior of human cancers, representing an ideal target for next-generation anti-cancer therapies. However CSCs are difficult to propagate in vitro, severely limiting the study of CSC biology and drug development. Here we report that growing cells from glioblastoma (GBM) cell lines on three dimensional (3D) porous chitosan-alginate (CA) scaffolds dramatically promotes the proliferation and enrichment of cells possessing the hallmarks of CSCs. CA scaffold-grown cells were found more tumorigenic in nude mouse xenografts than cells grown from monolayers. Growing in CA scaffolds rapidly promoted expression of genes involved in the epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition that has been implicated in the genesis of CSCs. Our results indicate that CA scaffolds have utility as a simple and inexpensive means to cultivate CSCs in vitro in support of studies to understand CSC biology and develop more effective anti-cancer therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.