Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25108670›Full record

ArticleMolecular neurobiology2015

Cannabidiol Exposure During Neuronal Differentiation Sensitizes Cells Against Redox-Active Neurotoxins.

Patrícia Schönhofen, Liana M de Medeiros, Ivi Juliana Bristot, Fernanda M Lopes, Marco A De Bastiani, Flávio Kapczinski, José Alexandre S Crippa, Mauro Antônio A Castro, Richard B Parsons, Fábio Klamt

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular neurobiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Cannabidiol Adverse Effects and Toxicity.Current neuropharmacology · 2019
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Developmental Effects of Cannabidiol and Δ9-Tetrahydrocannabinol in Zebrafish.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2018
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Patrícia SchönhofenDepartment of Biochemistry, Laboratory of Cellular Biochemistry, ICBS/UFRGS, Porto Alegre, RS, 90035-003, Brazil.
Liana M de Medeiros
Ivi Juliana Bristot
Fernanda M Lopes
Marco A De Bastiani
Flávio Kapczinski
José Alexandre S Crippa
Mauro Antônio A Castro
Richard B Parsons
Fábio Klamt
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul · BRHospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre · BRKing's College London · GBUniversidade de Ribeirão Preto · BRUniversidade Federal do Paraná · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cannabidiol (CBD), one of the most abundant Cannabis sativa-derived compounds, has been implicated with neuroprotective effect in several human pathologies. Until now, no undesired side effects have been associated with CBD. In this study, we evaluated CBD's neuroprotective effect in terminal differentiation (mature) and during neuronal differentiation (neuronal developmental toxicity model) of the human neuroblastoma SH-SY5Y cell line. A dose-response curve was performed to establish a sublethal dose of CBD with antioxidant activity (2.5 μM). In terminally differentiated SH-SY5Y cells, incubation with 2.5 μM CBD was unable to protect cells against the neurotoxic effect of glycolaldehyde, methylglyoxal, 6-hydroxydopamine, and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2). Moreover, no difference in antioxidant potential and neurite density was observed. When SH-SY5Y cells undergoing neuronal differentiation were exposed to CBD, no differences in antioxidant potential and neurite density were observed. However, CBD potentiated the neurotoxicity induced by all redox-active drugs tested. Our data indicate that 2.5 μM of CBD, the higher dose tolerated by differentiated SH-SY5Y neuronal cells, does not provide neuroprotection for terminally differentiated cells and shows, for the first time, that exposure of CBD during neuronal differentiation could sensitize immature cells to future challenges with neurotoxins.

Indexed as

CannabidiolCell DifferentiationCell Line, TumorCell ShapeGene Expression RegulationHumansNeuronsNeurotoxinsOxidation-ReductionTretinoinCannabidiolNeurotoxinsTretinoin

Identifiers

PMID25108670
OpenAlexW2056331268

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.