Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25108628›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of microbiology & biotechnology2014

Potent in vitro synergism of fusidic acid (FA) and berberine chloride (BBR) against clinical isolates of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA).

Rong-mei Liang, Xiao-lan Yong, Yu-qin Duan, Yong-hong Tan, Ping Zeng, Zi-ying Zhou, Yan Jiang, Shi-hua Wang, Yun-ping Jiang, Xiao-chun Huang and 4 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of microbiology & biotechnology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Biology and Regulation of Staphylococcal Biofilm.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Tackling strong biofilm and multi-virulent vancomycin-resistantFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. The effect of berberine chloride and/or its combination with vancomycin on the growth, biofilm formation, and motility of Clostridioides difficile.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2020
    Article
  15. Self-assembled filomicelles prepared from polylactide-poly(ethylene glycol) diblock copolymers for sustained delivery of cycloprotoberberine derivatives.Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2018
    Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rong-mei LiangDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, General Hospital of Chengdu Military Command Region, 270 Rongdu Road, Chengdu, 610083, People's Republic of China, rmliang2718@163.com.
Xiao-lan Yong
Yu-qin Duan
Yong-hong Tan
Ping Zeng
Zi-ying Zhou
Yan Jiang
Shi-hua Wang
Yun-ping Jiang
Xiao-chun Huang
Zhao-hui Dong
Ting-ting Hu
Hui-qing Shi
Nan Li
Kunming General Hospital of Chengdu Military Command · CNChengdu Military General Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It was found in the present study that combined use of fusidic acid (FA) and berberine chloride (BBR) offered an in vitro synergistic action against 7 of the 30 clinical methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) strains, with a fractional inhibitory concentration (FIC) index ranging from 0.5 to 0.19. This synergistic effect was most pronounced on MRSA 4806, an FA-resistant isolate, with a minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) value of 1,024 μg/ml. The time-kill curve experiment showed that FA plus BBR yielded a 4.2 log10 c.f.u./ml reduction in the number of MRSA 4806 bacteria after 24-h incubation as compared with BBR alone. Viable count analysis showed that FA plus BBR produced a 3.0 log10 c.f.u./ml decrease in biofilm formation and a 1.5 log10 c.f.u./ml decrease in mature biofilm in viable cell density as compared with BBR alone. In addition, phase contrast micrographs confirmed that biofilm formation was significantly inhibited and mature biofilm was obviously destructed when FA was used in combination with BBR. These results provide evidence that combined use of FA and BBR may prove to be a promising clinical therapeutic strategy against MRSA.

Indexed as

Drug SynergismAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial LoadBerberineBiofilmsFusidic AcidHumansMethicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureusMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMicrobial ViabilityStaphylococcal InfectionsAnti-Bacterial AgentsBerberineFusidic Acid

Identifiers

PMID25108628
OpenAlexW2059495581

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.