Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25108523›Full record

ArticleResearch in social & administrative pharmacy : RSAP

Exploring safety systems for dispensing in community pharmacies: focusing on how staff relate to organizational components.

Jasmine Harvey, Anthony J Avery, Darren Ashcroft, Matthew Boyd, Denham L Phipps, Nicholas Barber

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Research in social & administrative pharmacy : RSAP. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Categorizing and understanding medication errors in hospital pharmacy in relation to human factors.Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jasmine HarveyNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Division of Primary Care, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Queens Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK. Electronic address: Jasmine.Harvey@phc.ox.ac.uk.
Anthony J AveryDivision of Primary Care, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Queens Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK.
Darren AshcroftSchool of Pharmacy & Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, UK.
Matthew BoydSchool of Pharmacy, University of Nottingham, East Drive, University Park, Nottingham, UK.
Denham L PhippsSchool of Pharmacy & Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, UK.
Nicholas BarberSchool of Pharmacy, Department of Practice and Policy, University College London, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIdentifying risk is an important facet of a safety practice in an organization. To identify risk, all components within a system of operation should be considered. In clinical safety practice, a team of people, technologies, procedures and protocols, management structure and environment have been identified as key components in a system of operation.

objectivesTo explore risks in relation to prescription dispensing in community pharmacies by taking into account relationships between key components that relate to the dispensing process.

methodsFifteen community pharmacies in England with varied characteristics were identified, and data were collected using non-participant observations, shadowing and interviews. Approximately 360 hours of observations and 38 interviews were conducted by the team. Observation field notes from each pharmacy were written into case studies. Overall, 52,500 words from 15 case studies and interview transcripts were analyzed using thematic and line-by-line analyses. Validation techniques included multiple data collectors co-authoring each case study for consensus, review of case studies by members of the wider team including academic and practicing community pharmacists, and patient safety experts and two presentations (internally and externally) to review and discuss findings.

resultsRisks identified were related to relationships between people and other key components in dispensing. This included how different levels of staff communicated internally and externally, followed procedures, interacted with technical systems, worked with management, and engaged with the environment. In a dispensing journey, the following categories were identified which show how risks are inextricably linked through relationships between human components and other key components: 1) dispensing with divided attention; 2) dispensing under pressure; 3) dispensing in a restricted space or environment; and, 4) managing external influences.

conclusionsTo identify and evaluate risks effectively, an approach that includes understanding relationships between key components in dispensing is required. Since teams of people in community pharmacies are a key dispensing component, and therefore part of the operational process, it is important to note how they relate to other components in the environment within which they operate. Pharmacies can take the opportunity to reflect on the organization of their systems and review in particular how they can improve on the four key categories identified.

Indexed as

CommunicationCommunity Pharmacy ServicesData CollectionEnglandHumansPharmacistsRisk AssessmentClinical safety managementCommunity pharmacyHuman factorsPatient safety

Identifiers

PMID25108523
PMCPMC4330989

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.