Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25108461›Full record

ArticleHuman genetics2015

Predicting survival in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma from TP53 mutation.

David L Masica, Shuli Li, Christopher Douville, Judith Manola, Robert L Ferris, Barbara Burtness, Arlene A Forastiere, Wayne M Koch, Christine H Chung, Rachel Karchin

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Human genetics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. FAK Drives Resistance to Therapy in HPV-Negative Head and Neck Cancer in a p53-Dependent Manner.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2024
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Association of TP53 and CDKN2A Mutation Profile with Tumor Mutation Burden in Head and Neck Cancer.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2022
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Combined Aurora Kinase A (AURKA) and WEE1 Inhibition Demonstrates Synergistic Antitumor Effect in Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2019
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Genomic insights into head and neck cancer.Cancers of the head & neck · 2016
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Comparison of predicted and actual consequences of missense mutations.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2015
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Evolutionary Action Score ofAdvances in radiation oncology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

David L MasicaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Institute for Computational Medicine, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA, david.masica@gmail.com.
Shuli Li
Christopher Douville
Judith Manola
Robert L Ferris
Barbara Burtness
Arlene A Forastiere
Wayne M Koch
Christine H Chung
Rachel Karchin
Johns Hopkins University · USDana-Farber Cancer Institute · USJohns Hopkins Medicine · USFox Chase Cancer Center · USUniversity of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

Translational Research Central ServicesP30CA006973 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Rosalie Wollett · 1985 to 2026
$208.6M
Project-006U10CA180820 · NCI · ECOG-ACRIN MEDICAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION · PI Peter J ODwyer, MITCHELL D. SCHNALL · 2014 to 2026
$167.6M
ECOG OPERATIONS OFFICE (IBCSG)U10CA021115 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON · PI COMIS, ROBERT L · 1985 to 2013
$132.6M
Statistics CoreU10CA180794 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INST · PI PAUL J CATALANO, CONSTANTINE A. GATSONIS · 2014 to 2026
$111.2M
ECOG-ACRIN Biospecimen Bank to Support NCTNU24CA196172 · NCI · ECOG-ACRIN MEDICAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION · PI STANLEY R. HAMILTON, Scott D Jewell · 2015 to 2026
$41.1M
BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING TRAINING PROGRAMT32GM007057 · NIGMS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI KANOLD, PATRICK O, KARCHIN, RACHEL · 1985 to 2023
$10.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA006973NCI NIH HHS U10 CA021115NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180794NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180820NCI NIH HHS U24 CA196172NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007057
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For TP53-mutated head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCCs), the codon and specific amino acid sequence change resulting from a patient's mutation can be prognostic. Thus, developing a framework to predict patient survival for specific mutations in TP53 would be valuable. There are many bioinformatics and functional methods for predicting the phenotypic impact of genetic variation, but their overall clinical value remains unclear. Here, we assess the ability of 15 different methods to predict HNSCC patient survival from TP53 mutation, using TP53 mutation and clinical data from patients enrolled in E4393 by the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG), which investigated whether TP53 mutations in surgical margins were predictive of disease recurrence. These methods include: server-based computational tools SIFT, PolyPhen-2, and Align-GVGD; our in-house POSE and VEST algorithms; the rules devised in Poeta et al. with and without considerations for splice-site mutations; location of mutation in the DNA-bound TP53 protein structure; and a functional assay measuring WAF1 transactivation in TP53-mutated yeast. We assessed method performance using overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) from 420 HNSCC patients, of whom 224 had TP53 mutations. Each mutation was categorized as "disruptive" or "non-disruptive". For each method, we compared the outcome between the disruptive group vs. the non-disruptive group. The rules devised by Poeta et al. with or without our splice-site modification were observed to be superior to others. While the differences in OS (disruptive vs. non-disruptive) appear to be marginally significant (Poeta rules + splice rules, P = 0.089; Poeta rules, P = 0.053), both algorithms identified the disruptive group as having significantly worse PFS outcome (Poeta rules + splice rules, P = 0.011; Poeta rules, P = 0.027). In general, prognostic performance was low among assessed methods. Further studies are required to develop and validate methods that can predict functional and clinical significance of TP53 mutations in HNSCC patients.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsCarcinoma, Squamous CellComputational BiologyDisease ProgressionGenetics, MedicalHead and Neck NeoplasmsHumansMutationPrognosisSurvival AnalysisTumor Suppressor Protein p53TP53 protein, humanTumor Suppressor Protein p53

Identifiers

PMID25108461
PMCPMC4324386
OpenAlexW1995527384

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.