Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25107971›Full record

ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2014

Probing of microbial biofilm communities for coadhesion partners.

Stefan Ruhl, Andreas Eidt, Holger Melzl, Udo Reischl, John O Cisar

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Human oral lectin ZG16B acts as a cell wall polysaccharide probe to decode host-microbe interactions with oral commensals.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. BioMed research international · 2017
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Microbial Diversity in the Early In Vivo-Formed Dental Biofilm.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2016
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Stefan RuhlDepartment of Oral Biology, School of Dental Medicine, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, Buffalo, New York, USA Department of Operative Dentistry and Periodontology, Dental School, University Hospital Regensburg, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany shruhl@buffalo.edu.
Andreas EidtDepartment of Operative Dentistry and Periodontology, Dental School, University Hospital Regensburg, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Holger MelzlInstitute of Clinical Microbiology and Hygiene, University Hospital Regensburg, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Udo ReischlInstitute of Clinical Microbiology and Hygiene, University Hospital Regensburg, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
John O CisarLaboratory of Cell and Developmental Biology, National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
University Hospital Regensburg · DENational Institutes of Health · USUniversity at Buffalo, State University of New York · USUniversity of Regensburg · DE

Funding

Molecular Biology of Oral Microbial Adhesins and ReceptorsZIADE000672 · NIDCR · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DENTAL & CRANIOFACIAL RESEARCH · PI CISAR, JOHN O · 2009 to 2016
$6.9M
Microbial Recognition of Sialic Acid Diversity in the Salivary ProteomeR01DE019807 · NIDCR · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI RUHL, STEFAN HANS-KLAUS · 2010 to 2022
$4.7M
Intramural NIH HHSNIDCR NIH HHS DE019807NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE019807
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Investigations of interbacterial adhesion in dental plaque development are currently limited by the lack of a convenient assay to screen the multitude of species present in oral biofilms. To overcome this limitation, we developed a solid-phase fluorescence-based screening method to detect and identify coadhesive partner organisms in mixed-species biofilms. The applicability of this method was demonstrated using coaggregating strains of type 2 fimbrial adhesin-bearing actinomyces and receptor polysaccharide (RPS)-bearing streptococci. Specific adhesin/receptor-mediated coadhesion was detected by overlaying bacterial strains immobilized to a nitrocellulose membrane with a suspended, fluorescein-labeled bacterial partner strain. Coadhesion was comparable regardless of which cell type was labeled and which was immobilized. Formaldehyde treatment of bacteria, either in suspension or immobilized on nitrocellulose, abolished actinomyces type 2 fimbrial adhesin but not streptococcal RPS function, thereby providing a simple method for assigning complementary adhesins and glycan receptors to members of a coadhering pair. The method's broader applicability was shown by overlaying colony lifts of dental plaque biofilm cultures with fluorescein-labeled strains of type 2 fimbriated Actinomyces naeslundii or RPS-bearing Streptococcus oralis. Prominent coadhesion partners included not only streptococci and actinomyces, as expected, but also other bacteria not identified in previous coaggregation studies, such as adhesin- or receptor-bearing strains of Neisseria pharyngitis, Rothia dentocariosa, and Kingella oralis. The ability to comprehensively screen complex microbial communities for coadhesion partners of specific microorganisms opens a new approach in studies of dental plaque and other mixed-species biofilms.

Indexed as

Bacterial AdhesionBacterial Physiological PhenomenaMicrobial InteractionsBacteriaBacteriological TechniquesBiofilmsDental PlaqueMolecular Sequence DataSequence Analysis, DNA

Identifiers

PMID25107971
PMCPMC4249035
OpenAlexW2123816407

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.