Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25107969›Full record

ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2014

Diversity and antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella enterica isolates from surface water in Southeastern United States.

Baoguang Li, George Vellidis, Huanli Liu, Michele Jay-Russell, Shaohua Zhao, Zonglin Hu, Anita Wright, Christopher A Elkins

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Genomic analysis ofMicrobiology spectrum · 2024
    Article
  4. Detection ofMicrobiology spectrum · 2024
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Transboundary and emerging diseases · 2024
    Article
  7. Prevalence of STEC virulence markers andFrontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Genomic characterization ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Article
  14. Revisiting the Biological Behavior ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Applied and environmental microbiology · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Isolation and Characterization of a NovelFrontiers in microbiology · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Baoguang LiDivision of Molecular Biology, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, U.S. FDA, Laurel, Maryland, USA baoguang.li@fda.hhs.gov.
George VellidisUniversity of Georgia, Tifton, Georgia, USA.
Huanli LiuDivision of Molecular Biology, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, U.S. FDA, Laurel, Maryland, USA.
Michele Jay-RussellUniversity of California, Davis, Western Center for Food Safety, Davis, California, USA.
Shaohua ZhaoCenter for Veterinary Medicine, U.S. FDA, Laurel, Maryland, USA.
Zonglin HuDivision of Molecular Biology, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, U.S. FDA, Laurel, Maryland, USA.
Anita WrightUniversity of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
Christopher A ElkinsDivision of Molecular Biology, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, U.S. FDA, Laurel, Maryland, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A study of prevalence, diversity, and antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella enterica in surface water in the southeastern United States was conducted. A new scheme was developed for recovery of Salmonella from irrigation pond water and compared with the FDA's Bacteriological Analytical Manual (8th ed., 2014) (BAM) method. Fifty-one isolates were recovered from 10 irrigation ponds in produce farms over a 2-year period; nine Salmonella serovars were identified by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis analysis, and the major serovar was Salmonella enterica serovar Newport (S. Newport, n = 29), followed by S. enterica serovar Enteritidis (n = 6), S. enterica serovar Muenchen (n = 4), S. enterica serovar Javiana (n = 3), S. enterica serovar Thompson (n = 2), and other serovars. It is noteworthy that the PulseNet patterns of some of the isolates were identical to those of the strains that were associated with the S. Thompson outbreaks in 2010, 2012, and 2013, S. Enteritidis outbreaks in 2011 and 2013, and an S. Javiana outbreak in 2012. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing confirmed 16 S. Newport isolates of the multidrug resistant-AmpC (MDR-AmpC) phenotype, which exhibited resistance to ampicillin, chloramphenicol, streptomycin, sulfamethoxazole, and tetracycline (ACSSuT), and to the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd generations of cephalosporins (cephalothin, amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, and ceftriaxone). Moreover, the S. Newport MDR-AmpC isolates had a PFGE pattern indistinguishable from the patterns of the isolates from clinical settings. These findings suggest that the irrigation water may be a potential source of contamination of Salmonella in fresh produce. The new Salmonella isolation scheme significantly increased recovery efficiency from 21.2 (36/170) to 29.4% (50/170) (P = 0.0002) and streamlined the turnaround time from 5 to 9 days with the BAM method to 4 days and thus may facilitate microbiological analysis of environmental water.

Indexed as

Agricultural IrrigationAnti-Bacterial AgentsDrug Resistance, Multiple, BacterialElectrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-FieldFresh WaterMicrobial Sensitivity TestsSalmonella entericaSerogroupSoutheastern United StatesSpatio-Temporal AnalysisWater MicrobiologyAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID25107969
PMCPMC4178646

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.