Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25107966›Full record

ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2014

Dynamics of dual infection with Campylobacter jejuni strains in chickens reveals distinct strain-to-strain variation in infection ecology.

Gemma Chaloner, Paul Wigley, Suzanne Humphrey, Kirsty Kemmett, Lizeth Lacharme-Lora, Tom Humphrey, Nicola Williams

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Applied and environmental microbiology · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Involvement ofMicroorganisms · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Intestinal Colonization ofMicroorganisms · 2023
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Approaches to prevent and control Campylobacter spp. colonization in broiler chickens: a review.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2021
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Gemma ChalonerDepartment of Infection Biology, Institute of Infection and Global Health, University of Liverpool, Leahurst Campus, Neston, United Kingdom g.chaloner@liv.ac.uk.
Paul WigleyDepartment of Infection Biology, Institute of Infection and Global Health, University of Liverpool, Leahurst Campus, Neston, United Kingdom.
Suzanne HumphreyDepartment of Infection Biology, Institute of Infection and Global Health, University of Liverpool, Leahurst Campus, Neston, United Kingdom.
Kirsty KemmettDepartment of Infection Biology, Institute of Infection and Global Health, University of Liverpool, Leahurst Campus, Neston, United Kingdom.
Lizeth Lacharme-LoraDepartment of Infection Biology, Institute of Infection and Global Health, University of Liverpool, Leahurst Campus, Neston, United Kingdom.
Tom HumphreyDepartment of Infection Biology, Institute of Infection and Global Health, University of Liverpool, Leahurst Campus, Neston, United Kingdom.
Nicola WilliamsDepartment of Epidemiology and Population Health, Institute of Infection and Global Health, University of Liverpool, Leahurst Campus, Neston, United Kingdom.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/I024674/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although multiple genotypes of Campylobacter jejuni may be isolated from the same commercial broiler flock, little is known about the infection dynamics of different genotypes within individuals or their colonization sites within the gut. Single experimental infections with C. jejuni M1 (sequence type 137, clonal complex 45) and C. jejuni 13126 (sequence type 21, clonal complex 21) revealed that 13126 colonized the ceca at significantly higher levels. The dissemination and colonization sites of the two C. jejuni strains then were examined in an experimental broiler flock. Two 33-day-old broiler chickens were infected with M1 and two with 13126, and 15 birds were left unchallenged. Cloacal swabs were taken postinfection to determine the colonization and shedding of each strain. By 2 days postinfection (dpi), 8/19 birds were shedding M1 whereas none were shedding 13126. At 8 dpi, all birds were shedding both strains. At 18 dpi, liver and cecal levels of each isolate were quantified, while in 10 birds they also were quantified at nine sites throughout the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. 13126 was found throughout the GI tract, while M1 was largely restricted to the ceca and colon. The livers of 7/19 birds were culture positive for 13126 only. These data show that 13126 has a distinctly different infection biology than strain M1. It showed slower colonization of the lower GI tract but was more invasive and able to colonize at a high level throughout the GI tract. The finding that C. jejuni strains have markedly different infection ecologies within the chicken has implications for control in the poultry industry and suggests that the contamination risk of edible tissues is dependent on the isolate involved.

Indexed as

AnimalsBacterial LoadCampylobacter InfectionsCampylobacter jejuniChickensGastrointestinal TractLiverPoultry DiseasesSpecies Specificity

Identifiers

PMID25107966
PMCPMC4178652

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.