Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25107527›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer research : BCR2014

The dynamic range of circulating tumor DNA in metastatic breast cancer.

Maryam Heidary, Martina Auer, Peter Ulz, Ellen Heitzer, Edgar Petru, Christin Gasch, Sabine Riethdorf, Oliver Mauermann, Ingrid Lafer, Gunda Pristauz and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer research : BCR, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 70 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
70citing papers in PubMed
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

70 citing papers in PubMed, 134 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Towards liquid biopsy-based analysis of antitumour immunity.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

10 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Maryam Heidary
Martina Auer
Peter Ulz
Ellen Heitzer
Edgar Petru
Christin Gasch
Sabine Riethdorf
Oliver Mauermann
Ingrid Lafer
Gunda Pristauz
Sigurd Lax
Klaus Pantel
Jochen B Geigl
Michael R Speicher
Medical University of Graz · ATUniversität Hamburg · DEGraz University Hospital · AT

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF P 23284Austrian Science Fund FWF W 1226
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe management of metastatic breast cancer needs improvement. As clinical evaluation is not very accurate in determining the progression of disease, the analysis of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has evolved to a promising noninvasive marker of disease evolution. Indeed, ctDNA was reported to represent a highly sensitive biomarker of metastatic cancer disease directly reflecting tumor burden and dynamics. However, at present little is known about the dynamic range of ctDNA in patients with metastatic breast cancer.

methodsIn this study, 74 plasma DNA samples from 58 patients with metastasized breast cancer were analyzed with a microfluidic device to determine the plasma DNA size distribution and copy number changes in the plasma were identified by whole-genome sequencing (plasma-Seq). Furthermore, in an index patient we conducted whole-genome, exome, or targeted deep sequencing of the primary tumor, metastases, and circulating tumor cells (CTCs). Deep sequencing was done to accurately determine the allele fraction (AFs) of mutated DNA fragments.

resultsAlthough all patients had metastatic disease, plasma analyses demonstrated highly variable AFs of mutant fragments. We analyzed an index patient with more than 100,000 CTCs in detail. We first conducted whole-genome, exome, or targeted deep sequencing of four different regions from the primary tumor and three metastatic lymph node regions, which enabled us to establish the phylogenetic relationships of these lesions, which were consistent with a genetically homogeneous cancer. Subsequent analyses of 551 CTCs confirmed the genetically homogeneous cancer in three serial blood analyses. However, the AFs of ctDNA were only 2% to 3% in each analysis, neither reflecting the tumor burden nor the dynamics of this progressive disease. These results together with high-resolution plasma DNA fragment sizing suggested that differences in phagocytosis and DNA degradation mechanisms likely explain the variable occurrence of mutated DNA fragments in the blood of patients with cancer.

conclusionsThe dynamic range of ctDNA varies substantially in patients with metastatic breast cancer. This has important implications for the use of ctDNA as a predictive and prognostic biomarker.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsCluster AnalysisComputational BiologyDNA Copy Number VariationsDNA, NeoplasmExomeFemaleGene FrequencyHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansMutationNeoplasm MetastasisNeoplastic Cells, CirculatingReference ValuesBiomarkers, TumorDNA, Neoplasm

Identifiers

PMID25107527
PMCPMC4303230
OpenAlexW2154066075

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.