ArticleThe American journal of medicine2014
Bleeding rates in Veterans Affairs patients with atrial fibrillation who switch from warfarin to dabigatran.
Article in The American journal of medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Switching from Vitamin K Antagonists to Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Frail Elderly Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Pooled it
- Racial and ethnic disparities in arrhythmia care: A call for action.Heart rhythm · 2022Guideline
- Cost-Effectiveness of Direct Non-Vitamin K Oral Anticoagulants Versus Vitamin K Antagonists for the Management of Patients with Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation Based on Available "Real-World" Evidence: The Italian National Health System Perspective.Clinical drug investigation · 2021Pooled it
- The association between non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants and gastrointestinal bleeding: a meta-analysis of observational studies.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2016Pooled it
- Clinical Outcomes of Switching From Warfarin to Apixaban or Rivaroxaban in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Nationwide Multidatabase Study.Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes · 2025Article
- Differences in quality of anticoagulation care delivery according to ethnoracial group in the United States: A scoping review.Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2024Article
- Patients on vitamin K treatment: is switching to direct-acting oral anticoagulation cost-effective? A target trial on a prospective cohort.Open heart · 2024Observational
- Article
- Racial and sex differences in optimizing anticoagulation therapy for patients with atrial fibrillation.American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice · 2022Article
- Review
- Major bleeding risk associated with oral anticoagulant in real clinical practice. A multicentre 3-year period population-based prospective cohort study.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2020Article
- Practice-derived data on non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant therapy to complement observations from randomized trials.European heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology · 2020Article
- Thirty-day mortality in atrial fibrillation patients with gastrointestinal bleeding in the emergency department: differences between direct oral anticoagulant and warfarin users.Internal and emergency medicine · 2020Article
- Effectiveness and safety of direct oral anticoagulants in atrial fibrillation patients switched from vitamin K antagonists: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Basic & clinical pharmacology & toxicology · 2020Review
- Differences in outcomes between oral anticoagulation "new starters" and "switchers" in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation: A pooled analysis of the AMADEUS and BOREALIS trials.Journal of arrhythmia · 2019Article
- Choosing a particular oral anticoagulant and dose for stroke prevention in individual patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation: part 2.European heart journal · 2017Review
- Gastrointestinal bleeding in patients on novel oral anticoagulants: Risk, prevention and management.World journal of gastroenterology · 2017Review
- Review
- Decision-Making in Clinical Practice: Oral Anticoagulant Therapy in Patients with Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation and a Single Additional Stroke Risk Factor.Advances in therapy · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesClinical trial data suggest that dabigatran and warfarin have similar rates of major bleeding but higher rates of gastrointestinal bleeding. These findings have not been evaluated outside of a clinical trial. We evaluated the relative risks of any, gastrointestinal, intracranial, and other bleeding for Veterans Affairs patients who switched to dabigatran after at least 6 months on warfarin, compared with patients who continued on warfarin.
methodsWe used national Veterans Affairs administrative encounter and pharmacy data from fiscal years 2010-2012 to identify 85,344 patients with atrial fibrillation who had been taking warfarin for at least 180 days before June 2011, of whom 1394 (1.7%) received dabigatran (150 mg) during the next 15 months. Dates of the first occurrence of each type of bleed and dates of death from June 2011 to September 2012 were determined. Baseline and time-dependent patient characteristics were identified, including comorbid conditions, stroke and bleeding risk scores, and time in therapeutic range for international normalized ratios. Marginal structural models were used to address selection bias in the longitudinal observational data. Weighted logistic regression models were fit using generalized estimating equations and reflected baseline and time-dependent covariates and weekly indicators of anticoagulant type (warfarin or dabigatran).
resultsCompared with patients who never used dabigatran, patients who used dabigatran at least once were younger, were more likely to be white, had lower international normalized ratio time in therapeutic range on warfarin, had lower stroke risk scores, and had similar bleeding risk scores. Overall, 10,734 patients experienced bleeding events, including 131 events after dabigatran use. The risk-adjusted rate of any bleeding was higher with dabigatran compared with warfarin, which was largely driven by a 54% higher risk of gastrointestinal bleeding with dabigatran. Rates of intracranial, other bleeding, and death were similar for dabigatran and warfarin.
conclusionsDabigatran may increase the likelihood of gastrointestinal bleeds.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.