Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25107320›Full record

SynthesisOsteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA2015

C-reactive protein and risk of fracture: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies.

Z-J Wu, J-L He, R-Q Wei, B Liu, X Lin, J Guan, Y-B Lan

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. C-reactive protein and fracture risk: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies through the use of both frequentist and Bayesian approaches.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Depression and risk of hip fracture: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2019
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. The associations between serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D level and the risk of total fracture and hip fracture.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2017
    Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. The effect of hypersensitive C-reactive protein to albumin ratio on the risk of fragility fracture in the Chinese male population.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Independent association of bone mineral density and trabecular bone score to vertebral fracture in male subjects with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2018
    Article
  16. Risk of vertebral and non-vertebral fractures in patients with sarcoidosis: a population-based cohort.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Z-J WuDepartment of Bone and Soft Tissue Neurosurgery, Affiliated Tumor Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, He Di Rd. #71, Nanning, 530021, People's Republic of China.
J-L He
R-Q Wei
B Liu
X Lin
J Guan
Y-B Lan
Tumor Hospital of Guangxi Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledThis study systematically reviews prospective cohort studies evaluating the relationship between C-reactive protein (CRP) concentrations and subsequent fracture risk. The positive association cannot completely explain the existing evidence, and further studies are needed to demonstrate the shape of the association.

introductionWe aimed to perform a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of published prospective studies evaluating associations of high-sensitivity CRP (hs-CRP) levels with fracture risk in general populations.

methodsWe identified relevant studies by searching MEDLINE and EMBASE databases from their inception to May 20, 2014. We included published prospective studies evaluating the associations of hs-CRP levels with risk of fracture in general populations. Two reviewers working independently abstracted the data.

resultsEight prospective cohort studies involving 34,840 participants and 3,407 incident fracture events were eligible for the present analyses. A meta-analysis of six prospective studies showed that the overall risk for incident fracture in a comparison of individuals in the top tertile with those in the bottom tertile of baseline hs-CRP levels was 2.14 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.51-3.05, I(2) = 62.3%]. The moderate heterogeneous disappeared when one study was excluded. However, the remaining two studies reported inconsistent results. One study with the biggest sample size showed a U-shaped association for CRP and fracture risk (the association was positive when CRP > 1 mg/L). Similarly, another study reported that per doubling of CRP was positive only when CRP > 3 mg/L.

conclusionIn summary, the present analysis showed that the relationship between CRP concentrations and subsequent fracture risk is still inconsistent. The positive association cannot completely explain the existing evidence, and further larger prospective cohorts with more power are needed to demonstrate the shape of the association, especially for the relatively low CRP concentrations, such as less than 3 mg/L.

Indexed as

C-Reactive ProteinHumansInflammation MediatorsOsteoporotic FracturesProspective StudiesRisk AssessmentC-Reactive ProteinInflammation Mediators

Identifiers

PMID25107320
OpenAlexW1972953689

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.