Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25106748›Full record

ReviewCurrent problems in pediatric and adolescent health care2014

Physical, behavioral, and cognitive effects of prenatal tobacco and postnatal secondhand smoke exposure.

Sherry Zhou, David G Rosenthal, Scott Sherman, Judith Zelikoff, Terry Gordon, Michael Weitzman

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current problems in pediatric and adolescent health care, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 70 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
70citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

70 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 133 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Birth outcomes following intrauterine exposure to electronic nicotine delivery systems: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

10 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sherry ZhouNew York University School of Medicine, New York, NY.
David G RosenthalDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Washington, WA.
Scott ShermanDepartment of Population Health and Medicine, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY.
Judith ZelikoffNew York University School of Medicine, New York, NY; Department of Population Health and Medicine, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY.
Terry GordonNew York University School of Medicine, New York, NY; Department of Environmental Medicine, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY.
Michael WeitzmanNew York University School of Medicine, New York, NY; Department of Environmental Medicine, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY; Department of Pediatrics, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY.
New York University · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

RESEARCH IN ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES (CENTER GRANT)P30ES000260 · NIEHS · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI COSTA, MAX · 1985 to 2020
$26.1M
The adverse chronic effects of e-cigarettes: puff profiles, sex, genetics, and flavorings as modifying factorsR01CA239253 · NCI · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI GORDON, TERRY · 2018 to 2022
$1.5M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA239253NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES000260
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this review is to examine the rapidly expanding literature regarding the effects of prenatal tobacco and postnatal secondhand smoke (SHS) exposure on child health and development. Mechanisms of SHS exposure are reviewed, including critical periods during which exposure to tobacco products appears to be particularly harmful to the developing fetus and child. The biological, biochemical, and neurologic effects of the small fraction of identified components of SHS are described. Research describing these adverse effects of both in utero and childhood exposure is reviewed, including findings from both animal models and humans. The following adverse physical outcomes are discussed: sudden infant death syndrome, low birth weight, decreased head circumference, respiratory infections, otitis media, asthma, childhood cancer, hearing loss, dental caries, and the metabolic syndrome. In addition, the association between the following adverse cognitive and behavioral outcomes and such exposures is described: conduct disorder, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, poor academic achievement, and cognitive impairment. The evidence supporting the adverse effects of SHS exposure is extensive yet rapidly expanding due to improving technology and increased awareness of this profound public health problem. The growing use of alternative tobacco products, such as hookahs (a.k.a. waterpipes), and the scant literature on possible effects from prenatal and secondhand smoke exposure from these products are also discussed. A review of the current knowledge of this important subject has implications for future research as well as public policy and clinical practice.

Indexed as

Health PolicyPolicy MakingChild Behavior DisordersCognitionFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth PromotionHumansInfantInfant, Low Birth WeightInfant, NewbornIntelligenceMalePregnancyPrenatal Exposure Delayed EffectsSmokingTobacco Smoke Pollution

Identifiers

PMID25106748
PMCPMC6876620
OpenAlexW1978704280

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.