Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25106647›Full record

ArticleJournal of the National Cancer Institute2014

Realizing the potential of plasma genotyping in an age of genotype-directed therapies.

Jason J Luke, Geoffrey R Oxnard, Cloud P Paweletz, D Ross Camidge, John V Heymach, David B Solit, Bruce E Johnson, Cell Free DNA Working Group

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. [Progress of Liquid Biopsy in Early Diagnosis of Lung Cancer].Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer · 2018
    Review
  15. Liquid biopsy for lung cancer early detection.Journal of thoracic disease · 2018
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Management ofCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2017
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Role of circulating free DNA in colorectal cancer.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2016
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jason J LukeDana-Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA (JJL, GRO, CPP, BEJ), Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (DBS), University of Colorado Cancer Center, Denver, CO (DRC); The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX (JVH).
Geoffrey R OxnardDana-Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA (JJL, GRO, CPP, BEJ), Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (DBS), University of Colorado Cancer Center, Denver, CO (DRC); The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX (JVH).
Cloud P PaweletzDana-Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA (JJL, GRO, CPP, BEJ), Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (DBS), University of Colorado Cancer Center, Denver, CO (DRC); The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX (JVH).
D Ross CamidgeDana-Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA (JJL, GRO, CPP, BEJ), Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (DBS), University of Colorado Cancer Center, Denver, CO (DRC); The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX (JVH).
John V HeymachDana-Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA (JJL, GRO, CPP, BEJ), Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (DBS), University of Colorado Cancer Center, Denver, CO (DRC); The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX (JVH).
David B SolitDana-Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA (JJL, GRO, CPP, BEJ), Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (DBS), University of Colorado Cancer Center, Denver, CO (DRC); The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX (JVH).
Bruce E JohnsonDana-Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA (JJL, GRO, CPP, BEJ), Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (DBS), University of Colorado Cancer Center, Denver, CO (DRC); The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX (JVH). bejohnson@partners.org.
Cell Free DNA Working Group
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute · USUniversity of Colorado Cancer Center · USUniversity of Colorado Denver · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The identification of oncogenic driver mutations in cancer has led to the rapid rise of genotype-directed treatments such as EGFR and BRAF kinase inhibitors. Standard tumor biopsy remains a cumbersome and morbid procedure for patients, leading to a growing interest in noninvasive plasma genotyping approaches. Circulating tumor cells are of interest; however, the processing of specimens is complicated and time consuming. By comparison, cell-free DNA (cfDNA) genotyping has the potential to be convenient and relatively simple to process in a short time period. Several technologies are under development for cfDNA analysis, such as allele-specific polymerase chain reaction (PCR), coamplification at Lower Denaturation temperatures (COLD) PCR, emulsion PCR, and massively parallel sequencing. Broad clinical validity will need to be established for different assays, and clinical utility will need to be evaluated within prospective trials to determine which assays will best predict the efficacy of therapy and patient outcomes. In addition, assay standardization will be critical prior to widespread use in routine clinical practice. The Cell Free DNA Working Group, under the sponsorship of Transgenomic, was convened to evaluate the molecular assays in development and provide recommendations for application and interpretation of these tests in the context of future clinical research. The consensus commentary of the Cell Free DNA Working Group for the use of cfDNA plasma genotyping assays is presented here, including future steps in the development of these technologies.

Indexed as

GenotypeMolecular Targeted TherapyAntineoplastic AgentsErbB ReceptorsHumansMutationNeoplasmsProto-Oncogene ProteinsProto-Oncogene Proteins B-rafProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)ras ProteinsAntineoplastic AgentsEGFR protein, humanErbB ReceptorsKRAS protein, humanProto-Oncogene ProteinsProto-Oncogene Proteins B-rafProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)ras Proteins

Identifiers

PMID25106647
PMCPMC6281080
OpenAlexW2154323398

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.