Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25106551›Full record

ArticleMolecular & cellular proteomics : MCP2014

Ion mobility tandem mass spectrometry enhances performance of bottom-up proteomics.

Dominic Helm, Johannes P C Vissers, Christopher J Hughes, Hannes Hahne, Benjamin Ruprecht, Fiona Pachl, Arkadiusz Grzyb, Keith Richardson, Jason Wildgoose, Stefan K Maier and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Ion Mobility-Assisted Free Radical-Initiated Peptide Sequencing.International journal of mass spectrometry · 2025
    Article
  7. ProPept-MT: A Multi-Task Learning Model for Peptide Feature Prediction.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  8. Review
  9. The One Hour Human Proteome.Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Structure of mycobacterial respiratory complex I.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Dominic HelmFrom the ‡Chair for Proteomics and Bioanalytics, Center of Life and Food Sciences Weihenstephan, Technische Universität München, Freising, Germany;
Johannes P C Vissers§Waters Corporation, Manchester, UK;
Christopher J Hughes§Waters Corporation, Manchester, UK;
Hannes HahneFrom the ‡Chair for Proteomics and Bioanalytics, Center of Life and Food Sciences Weihenstephan, Technische Universität München, Freising, Germany;
Benjamin RuprechtFrom the ‡Chair for Proteomics and Bioanalytics, Center of Life and Food Sciences Weihenstephan, Technische Universität München, Freising, Germany;
Fiona PachlFrom the ‡Chair for Proteomics and Bioanalytics, Center of Life and Food Sciences Weihenstephan, Technische Universität München, Freising, Germany;
Arkadiusz Grzyb§Waters Corporation, Manchester, UK;
Keith Richardson§Waters Corporation, Manchester, UK;
Jason Wildgoose§Waters Corporation, Manchester, UK;
Stefan K MaierFrom the ‡Chair for Proteomics and Bioanalytics, Center of Life and Food Sciences Weihenstephan, Technische Universität München, Freising, Germany;
Harald MarxFrom the ‡Chair for Proteomics and Bioanalytics, Center of Life and Food Sciences Weihenstephan, Technische Universität München, Freising, Germany;
Mathias WilhelmFrom the ‡Chair for Proteomics and Bioanalytics, Center of Life and Food Sciences Weihenstephan, Technische Universität München, Freising, Germany;
Isabelle Becher¶Cellzome GmbH, Heidelberg, Germany;
Simone LemeerFrom the ‡Chair for Proteomics and Bioanalytics, Center of Life and Food Sciences Weihenstephan, Technische Universität München, Freising, Germany;
Marcus Bantscheff¶Cellzome GmbH, Heidelberg, Germany;
James I Langridge§Waters Corporation, Manchester, UK;
Bernhard KusterFrom the ‡Chair for Proteomics and Bioanalytics, Center of Life and Food Sciences Weihenstephan, Technische Universität München, Freising, Germany; ‖Center for Integrated Protein Science Munich, Germany kuster@tum.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One of the limiting factors in determining the sensitivity of tandem mass spectrometry using hybrid quadrupole orthogonal acceleration time-of-flight instruments is the duty cycle of the orthogonal ion injection system. As a consequence, only a fraction of the generated fragment ion beam is collected by the time-of-flight analyzer. Here we describe a method utilizing postfragmentation ion mobility spectrometry of peptide fragment ions in conjunction with mobility time synchronized orthogonal ion injection leading to a substantially improved duty cycle and a concomitant improvement in sensitivity of up to 10-fold for bottom-up proteomic experiments. This enabled the identification of 7500 human proteins within 1 day and 8600 phosphorylation sites within 5 h of LC-MS/MS time. The method also proved powerful for multiplexed quantification experiments using tandem mass tags exemplified by the chemoproteomic interaction analysis of histone deacetylases with Trichostatin A.

Indexed as

Flow Injection AnalysisHeLa CellsHistone Deacetylase InhibitorsHistone DeacetylasesHumansHydroxamic AcidsIonsPeptide FragmentsPhosphoproteinsPhosphorylationProteomicsSensitivity and SpecificityTandem Mass SpectrometryTime FactorsTrypsinHistone Deacetylase InhibitorsHistone DeacetylasesHydroxamic AcidsIonsPeptide FragmentsPhosphoproteinstrichostatin ATrypsin

Identifiers

PMID25106551
PMCPMC4256517

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.