Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25106487›Full record

Observational studyEuropean radiology2014

The diagnostic value of SE MRI and DWI of the spine in patients with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance, smouldering myeloma and multiple myeloma.

Julie C Dutoit, Matthias A Vanderkerken, Joris Anthonissen, Frederick Dochy, Koenraad L Verstraete

Abstract readComparative StudyObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in European radiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. EANM guidelines on the use of [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2024
    Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. New Developments in Myeloma Treatment and Response Assessment.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Advanced Imaging in Multiple Myeloma: New Frontiers for MRI.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. The use of whole-body MRI in multiple myeloma.Clinical medicine (London, England) · 2019
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Applications of PET-MRI in musculoskeletal disease.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Julie C DutoitDepartment of Radiology, Ghent University Hospital, De Pintelaan 185, 9000, Ghent, Belgium, julie.dutoit@ugent.be.
Matthias A Vanderkerken
Joris Anthonissen
Frederick Dochy
Koenraad L Verstraete
Ghent University Hospital · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo evaluate DWI of the bone marrow in the differentiation of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS), smouldering myeloma (SMM) and multiple myeloma (MM).

methodsThe retrospective study includes 64 patients with MGUS, 27 with SMM, 64 with new MM and 12 controls. Signal intensity (SI) of spinal SE-MRI and DWI (b0-1000) as well as apparent diffusion coefficients (ADC) were measured in the T10 and L3. Qualitative assessment of b-images was performed by one experienced radiologist.

resultsADC600 and ADC1000 are the best ADC values in differentiating patient groups (p < 0.030). SIT2, SIb1000 and ADC1000 are higher and SIT1 lower in L3 compared to T10 (p < 0.050). All quantitative parameters of L3 can differentiate significantly between MGUS and MM (p < 0.050) and between patients with percentage plasma cells (PC%) between 0-10 % compared to >50 % (p = 0.001). Only SIT2 for L3 can differentiate MGUS from SMM (p = 0.044) and PC%0-10 from PC%10-25 (p = 0.033). Qualitative interpretation of b1000 images allows differentiating MM patients from those with MGUS or SMM (p < 0.001).

conclusionsSpinal SE-MRI can differentiate among MGUS, SMM, MM and control subjects. DWI based on the SI on b1000 images and ADC values is increased in MM compared to MGUS and SMM. Qualitative assessment of b-images can differentiate MM from MGUS or SMM. KEY POINTS: • ADC values are higher in patients with MM compared to MGUS • DWI parameters change late in disease evolution • DWI is sensitive but not specific in diagnosing patients with MM • Qualitative DWI assessment is good in detecting myeloma patients.

Indexed as

Bone MarrowDiagnosis, DifferentialDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLumbar VertebraeMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedMonoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined SignificanceMultiple MyelomaPlasma CellsReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective StudiesThoracic Vertebrae

Identifiers

PMID25106487
OpenAlexW2043378672

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.