Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25106394›Full record

ArticlePsychometrika2013

On the likelihood ratio tests in bivariate ACDE models.

Hao Wu, Michael C Neale

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychometrika, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. The Boulder Workshop Question Box.Behavior genetics · 2021
    Article
  3. Article
  4. A Developmental Twin Study of Emotion Recognition and Its Negative Affective Clinical Correlates.Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry · 2018
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Likelihood-based confidence intervals for a parameter with an upper or lower bound.Structural equation modeling : a multidisciplinary journal · 2017
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Hao WuBoston College, 300 McGuinn Hall, 140 Commonwealth Ave, Chestnut Hill, MA, 02467, USA, hao.wu.5@bc.edu.
Michael C Neale

Funding

Psychometric and Genetic Assessments of Substance UseR37DA018673 · NIDA · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI NEALE, MICHAEL CHURTON · 2005 to 2014
$3.7M
Research Education in Statistical Genetics of Substance AbuseR25DA026119 · NIDA · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI NEALE, MICHAEL CHURTON · 2008 to 2018
$3.2M
NIDA NIH HHS R25 DA026119NIDA NIH HHS R25DA026-119NIDA NIH HHS R37 DA018673
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ACE and ADE models have been heavily exploited in twin studies to identify the genetic and environmental components in phenotypes. However, the validity of the likelihood ratio test (LRT) of the existence of a variance component, a key step in the use of such models, has been doubted because the true values of the parameters lie on the boundary of the parameter space of the alternative model for such tests, violating a regularity condition required for a LRT (e.g., Carey in Behav. Genet. 35:653-665, 2005; Visscher in Twin Res. Hum. Genet. 9:490-495, 2006). Dominicus, Skrondal, Gjessing, Pedersen, and Palmgren (Behav. Genet. 36:331-340, 2006) solve the problem of testing univariate components in ACDE models. Our current work as presented in this paper resolves the issue of LRTs in bivariate ACDE models by exploiting the theoretical frameworks of inequality constrained LRTs based on cone approximations. Our derivation shows that the asymptotic sampling distribution of the test statistic for testing a single bivariate component in an ACE or ADE model is a mixture of χ (2) distributions of degrees of freedom (dfs) ranging from 0 to 3, and that for testing both the A and C (or D) components is one of dfs ranging from 0 to 6. These correct distributions are stochastically smaller than the χ (2) distributions in traditional LRTs and therefore LRTs based on these distributions are more powerful than those used naively. Formulas for calculating the weights are derived and the sampling distributions are confirmed by simulation studies. Several invariance properties for normal data (at most) missing by person are also proved. Potential generalizations of this work are also discussed.

Indexed as

Likelihood FunctionsModels, StatisticalComputer SimulationEnvironmentHumansModels, GeneticPhenotypeTwinsTwin Studies as Topic

Identifiers

PMID25106394
PMCPMC4129549

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.