ArticlePsychometrika2013
On the likelihood ratio tests in bivariate ACDE models.
Article in Psychometrika, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Analytic Identification of Variance Component Models Common to Behavior Genetics.Behavior genetics · 2021Article
- The Boulder Workshop Question Box.Behavior genetics · 2021Article
- Genetic underpinnings of callous-unemotional traits and emotion recognition in children, adolescents, and emerging adults.Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines · 2019Article
- A Developmental Twin Study of Emotion Recognition and Its Negative Affective Clinical Correlates.Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry · 2018Article
- Age-Related Differences in the Structure of Genetic and Environmental Contributions to Types of Peer Victimization.Behavior genetics · 2018Article
- Likelihood-based confidence intervals for a parameter with an upper or lower bound.Structural equation modeling : a multidisciplinary journal · 2017Article
- A Note on the Identifiability of Fixed-Effect 3PL Models.Psychometrika · 2016Article
- Identification of Confirmatory Factor Analysis Models of Different Levels of Invariance for Ordered Categorical Outcomes.Psychometrika · 2016Article
- Does degree of gyrification underlie the phenotypic and genetic associations between cortical surface area and cognitive ability?NeuroImage · 2015Article
- Genetic relationship between the addiction diagnosis in adults and their childhood measure of addiction liability.Behavior genetics · 2015Article
- Adjusted confidence intervals for a bounded parameter.Behavior genetics · 2012Article
- Testing Variance Components in Linear Mixed Modeling Using Permutation.Multivariate behavioral researchArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The ACE and ADE models have been heavily exploited in twin studies to identify the genetic and environmental components in phenotypes. However, the validity of the likelihood ratio test (LRT) of the existence of a variance component, a key step in the use of such models, has been doubted because the true values of the parameters lie on the boundary of the parameter space of the alternative model for such tests, violating a regularity condition required for a LRT (e.g., Carey in Behav. Genet. 35:653-665, 2005; Visscher in Twin Res. Hum. Genet. 9:490-495, 2006). Dominicus, Skrondal, Gjessing, Pedersen, and Palmgren (Behav. Genet. 36:331-340, 2006) solve the problem of testing univariate components in ACDE models. Our current work as presented in this paper resolves the issue of LRTs in bivariate ACDE models by exploiting the theoretical frameworks of inequality constrained LRTs based on cone approximations. Our derivation shows that the asymptotic sampling distribution of the test statistic for testing a single bivariate component in an ACE or ADE model is a mixture of χ (2) distributions of degrees of freedom (dfs) ranging from 0 to 3, and that for testing both the A and C (or D) components is one of dfs ranging from 0 to 6. These correct distributions are stochastically smaller than the χ (2) distributions in traditional LRTs and therefore LRTs based on these distributions are more powerful than those used naively. Formulas for calculating the weights are derived and the sampling distributions are confirmed by simulation studies. Several invariance properties for normal data (at most) missing by person are also proved. Potential generalizations of this work are also discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.