Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25106084›Full record

ArticleTrends in cardiovascular medicine2014

Chelation therapy and cardiovascular disease: connecting scientific silos to benefit cardiac patients.

Julio G Peguero, Ivan Arenas, Gervasio A Lamas

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Trends in cardiovascular medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Julio G PegueroColumbia University Division of Cardiology at Mount Sinai Medical Center, Miami Beach, FL.
Ivan ArenasColumbia University Division of Cardiology at Mount Sinai Medical Center, Miami Beach, FL.
Gervasio A LamasColumbia University Division of Cardiology at Mount Sinai Medical Center, Miami Beach, FL. Electronic address: Gervasio.Lamas@msmc.com.
Mount Sinai Medical Center · US

Funding

Trial to Assess Chelation Therapy (TACT)U01AT001156 · NCCIH · MOUNT SINAI MEDICAL CENTER (MIAMI BEACH) · PI LAMAS, GERVASIO A · 2002 to 2004
$18.2M
MODE SELECTION TRIAL IN SINUS NODE DYSFUNCTION (MOST)U01HL049804 · NHLBI · MOUNT SINAI MEDICAL CENTER (MIAMI BEACH) · PI LAMAS, GERVASIO A · 1995 to 2000
$493k
NCCIH NIH HHS U01 AT001156NHLBI NIH HHS U01 HL049804
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Medical practitioners have treated atherosclerotic disease with chelation therapy for over 50 years. Lack of strong of evidence led conventional practitioners to abandon its use in the 1960s and 1970s. This relegated chelation therapy to complementary and alternative medicine practitioners, who reported good anecdotal results. Concurrently, the epidemiologic evidence linking xenobiotic metals with cardiovascular disease and mortality gradually accumulated, suggesting a plausible role for chelation therapy. On the basis of the continued use of chelation therapy without an evidence base, the National Institutes of Health released a Request for Applications for a definitive trial of chelation therapy. The Trial to Assess Chelation Therapy (TACT) was formulated as a 2 × 2 factorial randomized controlled trial of intravenous EDTA-based chelation vs. placebo and high-dose oral multivitamins and multiminerals vs. oral placebo. The composite primary endpoint was death, reinfarction, stroke, coronary revascularization, or hospitalization for angina. A total of 1708 post-MI patients who were 50 years or older with a creatinine of 2.0 or less were enrolled and received 55,222 infusions of disodium EDTA or placebo with a median follow-up of 55 months. Patients were on evidence-based post-MI medications including statins. EDTA proved to be safe. EDTA chelation therapy reduced cardiovascular events by 18%, with a 5-year number needed to treat (NNT) of 18. Prespecified subgroup analysis revealed a robust benefit in patients with diabetes mellitus with a 41% reduction in the primary endpoint (5-year NNT = 6.5), and a 43% 5-year relative risk reduction in all-cause mortality (5-year NNT = 12). The magnitude of benefit is such that it suggests urgency in replication and implementation, which could, due to the excellent safety record, occur simultaneously.

Indexed as

Edetic AcidMetals, HeavyXenobioticsCardiovascular AgentsCardiovascular DiseasesChelating AgentsChelation TherapyDrug Therapy, CombinationEndpoint DeterminationEvidence-Based MedicineFemaleHealth Services Needs and DemandHumansMaleMiddle AgedOutcome Assessment, Health CareCardiovascular AgentsChelating AgentsEdetic AcidMetals, HeavyVitaminsXenobiotics

Identifiers

PMID25106084
PMCPMC4152775
OpenAlexW2049194998

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.