ArticlePloS one2014
Tooth loss in the United Kingdom--trends in social inequalities: an age-period-and-cohort analysis.
Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 77 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Effect of Tobacco Smoking on Tooth Loss: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical periodontology · 2026Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Trial
- Education-Based Inequality in Edentulism and Functional Dentition Among Older Brazilian Adults: A Study Covering a Period of 20 Years.International journal of dentistry · 2026Article
- Effects of age and period on functional dentition: an analysis of skin color/race inequalities in the 2003-2023 National Oral Health Surveys (SB Brasil).Revista brasileira de epidemiologia = Brazilian journal of epidemiology · 2026Article
- Trends and inequalities in age-standardized prevalence rate of edentulism among members of European Union between 1990 and 2021.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- An evaluation by dental clinicians of cutting characteristics and haptic perceptions in 3D-printed typodont teeth: A pilot study.Journal of dental education · 2025Article
- Oral characteristics in adult individuals with periodontal Ehlers-Danlos syndrome.Journal of clinical periodontology · 2022Article
- Comparing the magnitude of oral health inequality over time in Canada and the United States.Journal of public health dentistry · 2022Article
- Article
- Poor dental condition is a factor of imbalance of the nutritional status at the outset of management of head and neck cancer.Clinical oral investigations · 2022Article
- Article
- Article
- Age period cohort analysis of chewing ability in Korea from 2007 to 2018.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Did the Expansion of Insurance Coverage for Oral Health Reduce Self-reported Oral Health Inequalities in Korea? Results of Repeated Cross-Sectional Analysis, 2007-2015.Journal of epidemiology · 2020Article
- Education and income-based inequality in tooth loss among Brazilian adults: does the place you live make a difference?BMC oral health · 2020Article
- Understanding the association between self-reported poor oral health and exposure to adverse childhood experiences: a retrospective study.BMC oral health · 2020Article
- Number of Remaining Teeth and Its Association with Educational Level in Chilean Adults: Data from the National Health Survey 2016-2017.International journal of dentistry · 2020Article
- Socioeconomic Inequalities in Oral Health-Related Quality of Life among Brazilians: A Cross-Sectional Study.Dentistry journal · 2019Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study assessed trends in social inequalities in tooth loss in the United Kingdom between 1988 and 2009. Data from 20,126 adults who participated in the latest three national Adult Dental Health Surveys in England, Wales and Northern Ireland were used. Social class was determined using the 6-point Registrar General's Social Class. Three indicators of tooth loss were analysed; the proportion of edentate people among all adults and the number of teeth and the proportion with functional dentition (defined as having 20+ teeth) among dentate adults. Trends were modelled within an age, period and cohort framework using partial least squares regression (PLSR). Confidence intervals for PLSR estimates were obtained using non-parametric bootstrapping. The Slope and Relative Index of Inequality (SII and RII) were used to quantify social inequalities in tooth loss. Between 1988 and 2009, absolute inequalities in total tooth loss narrowed (SII changed from -28.4% to -15.3%) while relative inequalities widened (RII from 6.21 to 20.9) in the whole population. On the other hand, absolute and relative social inequality in tooth loss remained fairly stable over time among dentate adults. There was an absolute difference of 2.5-2.9 in number of teeth and 22-26% in the proportion with functional dentition between the lowest and highest social classes. In relative terms, the highest social class had 10-11% more teeth and 25-28% higher probability of having functional dentition than the lowest social class. The findings show pervasive inequalities in tooth loss by social class among British adults despite marked improvements in tooth retention in recent years and generations. In the whole adult population, absolute inequalities in tooth loss have narrowed while relative inequalities have increased steadily. Among dentate adults, absolute and relative inequalities in number of teeth and proportion of people with functional dentition have remained significant but unchanged over time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.