Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25105093›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in oncology2014

The Role of Heparanase and Sulfatases in the Modification of Heparan Sulfate Proteoglycans within the Tumor Microenvironment and Opportunities for Novel Cancer Therapeutics.

Edward Hammond, Ashwani Khurana, Viji Shridhar, Keith Dredge

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 122 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
122citing papers in PubMed
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

122 citing papers in PubMed, 178 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Integrated 3D-QSAR and cellular profiling of sulfated and hydrophobic aminoglycoside glycans to modulate heparanase activity.Medicinal chemistry research : an international journal for rapid communications on design and mechanisms of action of biologically active agents · 2026
    Article
  3. International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Bioinformatic Approach to Identify Positive PrognosticInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. UtilizingAmerican journal of physiology. Cell physiology · 2025
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. miRNA profiling of esophageal adenocarcinoma using transcriptome analysis.Cancer biomarkers : section A of Disease markers · 2024
    Article

62 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Edward HammondProgen Pharmaceuticals Ltd. , Brisbane, QLD , Australia.
Ashwani KhuranaDepartment of Experimental Pathology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine , Rochester, MN , USA.
Viji ShridharDepartment of Experimental Pathology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine , Rochester, MN , USA.
Keith DredgeProgen Pharmaceuticals Ltd. , Brisbane, QLD , Australia.
Mayo Clinic in Arizona · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Heparan sulfate proteoglycans (HSPGs) are an integral and dynamic part of normal tissue architecture at the cell surface and within the extracellular matrix. The modification of HSPGs in the tumor microenvironment is known to result not just in structural but also functional consequences, which significantly impact cancer progression. As substrates for the key enzymes sulfatases and heparanase, the modification of HSPGs is typically characterized by the degradation of heparan sulfate (HS) chains/sulfation patterns via the endo-6-O-sulfatases (Sulf1 and Sulf2) or by heparanase, an endo-glycosidase that cleaves the HS polymers releasing smaller fragments from HSPG complexes. Numerous studies have demonstrated how these enzymes actively influence cancer cell proliferation, signaling, invasion, and metastasis. The activity or expression of these enzymes has been reported to be modified in a variety of cancers. Such observations are consistent with the degradation of normal architecture and basement membranes, which are typically compromised in metastatic disease. Moreover, recent studies elucidating the requirements for these proteins in tumor initiation and progression exemplify their importance in the development and progression of cancer. Thus, as the influence of the tumor microenvironment in cancer progression becomes more apparent, the focus on targeting enzymes that degrade HSPGs highlights one approach to maintain normal tissue architecture, inhibit tumor progression, and block metastasis. This review discusses the role of these enzymes in the context of the tumor microenvironment and their promise as therapeutic targets for the treatment of cancer.

Indexed as

cancer therapyheparanaseheparan sulfateSulf1Sulf2tumor microenvironment targeting

Identifiers

PMID25105093
PMCPMC4109498
OpenAlexW2018242510

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.