Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25104980›Full record

ArticleHeart views : the official journal of the Gulf Heart Association2014

The Efficacy of Hydration with Normal Saline Versus Hydration with Sodium Bicarbonate in the Prevention of Contrast-induced Nephropathy.

Khalil Mahmoodi, Bahram Sohrabi, Farzad Ilkhchooyi, Majid Malaki, Mortaza E Khaniani, Mehdi Hemmati

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heart views : the official journal of the Gulf Heart Association, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Observational
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Treatment and management of ascites and hepatorenal syndrome: an update.Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology · 2015
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Khalil MahmoodiDepartment of Madani Heart Centre, Tabriz University of Medical Science, Tabriz, Iran.
Bahram SohrabiDepartment of Madani Heart Centre, Tabriz University of Medical Science, Tabriz, Iran.
Farzad IlkhchooyiDepartment of Madani Heart Centre, Tabriz University of Medical Science, Tabriz, Iran.
Majid MalakiDepartment of Madani Heart Centre, Tabriz University of Medical Science, Tabriz, Iran.
Mortaza E KhanianiDepartment of Madani Heart Centre, Tabriz University of Medical Science, Tabriz, Iran.
Mehdi HemmatiDepartment of Madani Heart Centre, Tabriz University of Medical Science, Tabriz, Iran.
University of Tabriz · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundContrast-induced acute kidney injury [contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN)] is one of the major causes of hospital-acquired acute renal failure. Volume supplementation is the most effective strategy to prevent acute renal failure caused by contrast; but the effects of sodium bicarbonate regimens are unknown in CIN prevention. The aim of this survey is to compare the efficacy of hydration with normal saline versus hydration with sodium bicarbonate in the prevention of the CIN in patients undergoing coronary angiography. MATERIALS AND

methodsIn a clinical trial, 350 patients undergoing coronary interventions were randomized into two groups: One group received normal saline and another group received sodium bicarbonate before and after infusion of the contrast. Patients in both the groups had received N-acetylcysteine. CIN was defined as relative increase in serum creatinine equal to or more than 25% of baseline or increase to 0.5 mg/dl in 48 h after the injection of the contrast.

resultsCIN was seen in 46 patients (13.1%) after coronary interventions. Incidence of CIN in patients receiving normal saline (19.4%) was more than in patients receiving sodium bicarbonate (6.9%) (P = 0.001). Hemodialysis was needed only in one patient who received saline normal. Relative risk to induce CIN in both groups was as 2.8 and was in the range of 1.50-5.25 with confidence interval of 95% and P = 0.001. Thus, the probability of CIN was significantly more in the usage of normal saline.

conclusionThis survey showed that hydration with sodium bicarbonate is superior to hydration with normal saline and has better protection effects.

Indexed as

Contrastnephropathysodium bicarbonate

Identifiers

PMID25104980
PMCPMC4124663
OpenAlexW1981218947

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.