Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25104529›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American College of Cardiology2014

Impact of achieved blood pressures on mortality risk and end-stage renal disease among a large, diverse hypertension population.

John J Sim, Jiaxiao Shi, Csaba P Kovesdy, Kamyar Kalantar-Zadeh, Steven J Jacobsen

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 63 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
63citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

63 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Guideline
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

John J SimDivision of Nephrology and Hypertension, Kaiser Permanente Los Angeles Medical Center, Los Angeles, California. Electronic address: John.j.sim@kp.org.
Jiaxiao ShiDepartment of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, California.
Csaba P KovesdyMemphis VA Medical Center, Memphis, Tennessee.
Kamyar Kalantar-ZadehHarold Simmons Center for Kidney Disease Research and Epidemiology, Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, University of California Irvine Medical Center, Orange, California.
Steven J JacobsenDepartment of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, California.

Funding

MALNUTRITION, DIET AND RACIAL DISPARITIES IN CKDK24DK091419 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI KALANTAR-ZADEH, KAMYAR · 2011 to 2020
$1.8M
Examining Racial and Cardiovascular Paradoxes in Chronic Kidney DiseaseR01DK078106 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI KALANTAR-ZADEH, KAMYAR · 2007 to 2011
$1.1M
Racial and Cardiovascular Risk Factor Anomalies in CKDR01DK096920 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE HEALTH SCI CTR · PI KALANTAR-ZADEH, KAMYAR, KOVESDY, CSABA PAL · 2013 to 2015
$909k
NIDDK NIH HHS K24 DK091419NIDDK NIH HHS K24-DK091419NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK078106NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK096920NIDDK NIH HHS R01-DK096920
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMedical data or clinical guidelines have not adequately addressed the ideal blood pressure (BP) treatment targets for survival and renal outcome.

objectivesThis study sought to evaluate ranges of treated BP in a large hypertension population and compare risk of mortality and end-stage renal disease (ESRD).

methodsA retrospective cohort study within the Kaiser Permanente Southern California health system was performed from January 1, 2006, to December 31, 2010. Treated hypertensive subjects ≥ 18 years of age were studied. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to evaluate the risks (hazard ratios) for mortality and/or ESRD among different BP categories with and without stratification for diabetes mellitus and older age.

resultsAmong 398,419 treated hypertensive subjects (30% with diabetes mellitus), mortality occurred in 25,182 (6.3%) and ESRD in 4,957 (1.2%). Adjusted hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals [CI]) for composite mortality/ESRD in systolic BP <110, 110 to 119, 120 to 129, 140 to 149, 150 to 159, 160 to 169, and ≥ 170 compared with 130 to 139 mm Hg were 4.1 (95% CI: 3.8 to 1.3), 1.8 (95% CI: 1.7 to 1.9), 1.1 (95% CI: 1.1 to 1.1), 1.4 (95% CI: 1.4 to 1.5), 2.3 (95% CI: 2.2 to 2.5), 3.3 (95% CI: 3.0 to 3.6), and 4.9 (95% CI: 4.4 to 5.5) respectively. Diastolic BP 60 to 79 mm Hg were associated with the lowest risk. The nadir systolic and diastolic BP for the lowest risk was 137 and 71 mm Hg, respectively. Stratified analyses revealed that the diabetes mellitus population had a similar hazard ratio curve but a lower nadir at 131 and 69 mm Hg but age ≥ 70 had a higher nadir (140 and 70 mm Hg).

conclusionsBoth higher and lower treated BP compared with 130 to 139 mm Hg systolic and 60 to 79 mm Hg diastolic ranges had worsened outcomes. Our study adds to the growing uncertainty about BP treatment targets.

Indexed as

Population SurveillanceAgedBlood PressureCohort StudiesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansHypertensionKidney Failure, ChronicMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsSurvival Rateblood pressure goalshypertension treatmentmortality riskrenal failure risktreatment risk

Identifiers

PMID25104529
PMCPMC4136516

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.