Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25104504›Full record

ReviewJournal of gastrointestinal cancer2014

Post hepatectomy liver failure: concept of management.

Kaushal Yadav, Shailesh Shrikhande, Mahesh Goel

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of gastrointestinal cancer, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Short-Term Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Portal Vein Embolization: an ACS-NSQIP Procedure-Targeted Hepatectomy Analysis.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2020
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Defining Post Hepatectomy Liver Insufficiency: Where do We stand?Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2015
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kaushal YadavDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Hepatopancreaticobiliary and GI services, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India, kaushalyadavoo7@yahoo.com.
Shailesh Shrikhande
Mahesh Goel

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn literature, the reported mortality of posthepatectomy liver failure is <5 % and morbidity is 15-30 %. Around 3-8 % of patients develop liver failure after major hepatic resection.

objectiveThe objective of the study was to provide current definitions and managing posthepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) as per severity and ISGLS grading.

methodA systemic search of pubmed indexed articles was done and relevant articles were selected to formulate latest guidelines for PHLF.

conclusionWe were able to make an algorithm for standardizing management so as to identify and treat PHLF as early as possible.

Indexed as

HepatectomyHumansLiver FailurePostoperative ComplicationsRisk Factors

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.