Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25104115›Full record

ArticleBMC medical ethics2014

A perpetual source of DNA or something really different: ethical issues in the creation of cell lines for African genomics research.

Jantina de Vries, Akin Abayomi, James Brandful, Katherine Littler, Ebony Madden, Patricia Marshall, Odile Ouwe Missi Oukem-Boyer, Janet Seeley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical ethics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jantina de VriesDepartment of Medicine, University of Cape Town, Office J52-16, UCT Centre for Clinical Research, Old Main Building, Groote Schuur Hospital, Observatory, 7925 Cape Town, South Africa. Jantina.devries@uct.ac.za.
Akin Abayomi
James Brandful
Katherine Littler
Ebony Madden
Patricia Marshall
Odile Ouwe Missi Oukem-Boyer
Janet Seeley

Funding

H3ABioNet: a sustainable African Bioinformatics Network for H3AfricaU41HG006941 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF CAPE TOWN · PI MULDER, NICOLA · 2012 to 2017
$14.8M
Training ProgramP50HG003390 · NHGRI · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI WIESNER, GEORGIA L · 2004 to 2013
$8.8M
Development of stem cell, blood & DNA bio repositories to facilitate studies on HUH2HG007092 · NHGRI · STELLENBOSCH UNIVERSITY · PI ABAYOMI, AKIN EMMANUEL · 2012 to 2013
$221k
Medical Research CouncilNHGRI NIH HHS 1U41HG006941-01NHGRI NIH HHS 1UH2HG007092NHGRI NIH HHS P50-HG-003390-06Wellcome Trust WT099313MA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe rise of genomic studies in Africa - not least due to projects funded under H3Africa - is associated with the development of a small number of biorepositories across Africa. For the ultimate success of these biorepositories, the creation of cell lines including those from selected H3Africa samples would be beneficial. In this paper, we map ethical challenges in the creation of cell lines. DISCUSSION: The first challenge we identified relates to the moral status of cells living in culture. There is no doubt that cells in culture are alive, and the question is how this characteristic is relevant to ethical decision-making. The second challenge relates to the fact that cells in culture are a source of cell products and mitochondrial DNA. In combination with other technologies, cells in culture could also be used to grow human tissue. Whilst on the one hand, this feature increases the potential utility of the sample and promotes science, on the other it also enables further scientific work that may not have been specifically consented to or approved. The third challenge relates to ownership over samples, particularly in cases where cell lines are created by a biobank, and in a different country than where samples were collected. Relevant questions here concern the export of samples, approval of secondary use and the acceptability of commercialisation. A fourth challenge relates to perceptions of blood and bodily integrity, which may be particularly relevant for African research participants from certain cultures or backgrounds. Finally, we discuss challenges around informed consent and ethical review. SUMMARY: In this paper, we sought to map the myriad of ethical challenges that need to be considered prior to making cell line creation a reality in the H3Africa project. Considering the relative novelty of this practice in Africa, such challenges will need to be considered, discussed and potentially be resolved before cell line creation in Africa becomes financially feasible and sustainable. We suggest that discussions need to be undertaken between stakeholders internationally, considering the international character of the H3Africa project. We also map out avenues for empirical research.

Indexed as

Bioethical IssuesDNAInformed ConsentAfricaBiological Specimen BanksBlack PeopleCell LineCultureEthical ReviewGenetic ResearchGenomicsHumansOwnershipDNA

Identifiers

PMID25104115
PMCPMC4134117

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.