Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25103913›Full record

Trial reportBMC medical imaging2014

The use of PET-MRI in the follow-up after radiofrequency- and microwave ablation of colorectal liver metastases.

Karin Nielsen, Hester J Scheffer, Indra C Pieters, Aukje A J M van Tilborg, Jan-Hein T M van Waesberghe, Daniela E Oprea-Lager, Martijn R Meijerink, Geert Kazemier, Otto S Hoekstra, Hermien W H Schreurs and 4 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC medical imaging, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01895673 (The Use of PET-MRI in the Follow-up of RFA and MWA Treated Colorectal Liver Metastases), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01895673 completednot on this map

The Use of PET-MRI in the Follow-up of RFA and MWA Treated Colorectal Liver Metastases

TypeobservationalSponsordr. M.P. van den Tol MD PhDRan2013 to 2016Enrolled20ConditionsLiver Neoplasms, Local Neoplasm RecurrenceArmsGadolinium
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Cryotherapy for liver metastases.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Karin Nielsen
Hester J Scheffer
Indra C Pieters
Aukje A J M van Tilborg
Jan-Hein T M van Waesberghe
Daniela E Oprea-Lager
Martijn R Meijerink
Geert Kazemier
Otto S Hoekstra
Hermien W H Schreurs
Colin Sietses
Sybren Meijer
Emile F I Comans
Petrousjka M P van den TolDepartment of Surgery, VU University Medical Center, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands. mp.vandentol@vumc.nl.
Amsterdam UMC Location VUmc · NLMedisch Centrum Alkmaar · NLZiekenhuis Gelderse Vallei · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThermal ablation of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) may result in local progression, which generally appear within a year of treatment. As the timely diagnosis of this progression allows potentially curative local treatment, an optimal follow-up imaging strategy is essential. PET-MRI is a one potential imaging modality, combining the advantages of PET and MRI. The aim of this study is evaluate fluorine-18 deoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG) PET-MRI as a modality for detection of local tumor progression during the first year following thermal ablation, as compared to the current standard, FDG PET-CT. The ability of FDG PET-MRI to detect new intrahepatic lesions, and the extent to which FDG PET-MRI alters clinical management, inter-observer variability and patient preference will also be included as secondary outcomes. METHODS/

designTwenty patients undergoing treatment with radiofrequency or microwave ablation for (recurrent) CRLM will be included in this prospective trial. During the first year of follow-up, patients will be scanned at the VU University Medical Center at 3-monthly intervals using a 4-phase liver CT, FDG PET-CT and FDG PET-MRI. Patients treated with chemotherapy <6 weeks prior to scanning or with a contra-indication for MRI will be excluded. MRI will be performed using both whole body imaging (mDixon) and dedicated liver sequences, including diffusion-weighted imaging, T1 in-phase and opposed-phase, T2 and dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging. The results of all modalities will be scored by 4 individual reviewers and inter-observer agreement will be determined. The reference standard will be histology or clinical follow-up. A questionnaire regarding patients' experience with both modalities will also be completed at the end of the follow-up year. DISCUSSION: Improved treatment options for local site recurrences following CRLM ablation mean that accurate post-ablation staging is becoming increasingly important. The combination of the sensitivity of MRI as a detection method for small intrahepatic lesions with the ability of FDG PET to visualize enhanced metabolism at the ablation site suggests that FDG PET-MRI could potentially improve the accuracy of (early) detection of progressive disease, and thus allow swifter and more effective decision-making regarding appropriate treatment.

trial registrationTRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01895673.

Indexed as

Fluorodeoxyglucose F18RadiopharmaceuticalsCatheter AblationColorectal NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerFollow-Up StudiesHumansLiver NeoplasmsMagnetic Resonance ImagingMultimodal ImagingObserver VariationPositron-Emission TomographyProspective StudiesFluorodeoxyglucose F18Radiopharmaceuticals

Identifiers

PMID25103913
PMCPMC4141664
OpenAlexW2065691120

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.