Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25103610›Full record

ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2014

Low-field magnetic resonance imaging or combined ultrasonography and anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody improve correct classification of individuals as established rheumatoid arthritis: results of a population-based, cross-sectional study.

Jens K Pedersen, Tove Lorenzen, Bo Ejbjerg, Marcin Szkudlarek, Anne Voss, Mikkel Østergaard, Anders J Svendsen, Lis S Andersen, Kim Hørslev-Petersen

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Approach to MR Imaging of the Elbow and Wrist: Technical Aspects and Innovation.Magnetic resonance imaging clinics of North America · 2015
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Jens K PedersenKing Christian 10th Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, South Jutland Hospital, Toldbodgade 3, 6300 Graasten, Denmark. jensk@dadlnet.dk.
Tove Lorenzen
Bo Ejbjerg
Marcin Szkudlarek
Anne Voss
Mikkel Østergaard
Anders J Svendsen
Lis S Andersen
Kim Hørslev-Petersen
University of Southern Denmark · DKOdense University Hospital · DKSlagelse Hospital · DKUniversity of Copenhagen · DKZealand University Hospital Køge · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim of the present study was to evaluate the accuracy of two approaches using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or combined ultrasonography (US) and anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody (ACPA) for diagnosis and classification of individuals with established rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

methodsIn 53 individuals from a population-based, cross-sectional study, historic fulfilment of the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 1987 criteria ("classification") or RA diagnosed by a rheumatologist ("diagnosis") were used as standard references. The sensitivity, specificity and Area under Curve for Receiver Operating Characteristics curves (ROC-area: (sensitivity + specificity)/2) were calculated for "current fulfilment of the ACR 1987 criteria" (list format), "adapted ACR 1987 criteria" (list format, substituting IgM rheumatoid factor with ACPA and clinical joint swelling and erosions on radiography with synovitis and erosions detected by US on a semi-quantitative scale), and RA MRI scoring System (RAMRIS) scores on low-field MRI in the unilateral hand.

resultsFor the ACR 1987 criteria the ROC-area was 75% (sensitivity/specificity = 50%/100%) (with "classification" as standard reference) and 69% (44%/94%) (with "diagnosis" as standard reference), while for the adapted ACR 1987 criteria it was 86% (75%/97%) (classification) and 82% (72%/91%) (diagnosis). For RAMRIS synovitis score in metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joints only (cut-off ≥5), the ROC-area (sensitivity/specificity) was 78% (62%/94%) (classification) and 85% (69%/100%) (diagnosis), while for the total synovitis score of MCP joints plus wrist (cut-off ≥10) it was 78% (62%/94%) (both classification and diagnosis).

conclusionsCompared with the ACR 1987 criteria, low-field MRI alone or adapted criteria incorporating US and ACPA increased the correct classification and diagnosis of RA.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingAdultAgedAged, 80 and overArea Under CurveArthritis, RheumatoidAutoantibodiesBiomarkersCross-Sectional StudiesDenmarkFemaleHumansJointsMaleMiddle AgedMultimodal ImagingAutoantibodiesBiomarkerscyclic citrullinated peptidePeptides, Cyclic

Identifiers

PMID25103610
PMCPMC4132194
OpenAlexW2041214473

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.