ReviewDer Pathologe2014
[Cutaneous adnexal and salivary gland tumours. Similarities and differences].
Review in Der Pathologe, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comprehensive comparison of salivary gland and cutaneous adnexal tumors: analogous versus discrepant clinical, terminological, histological, and molecular features : Part II: Second series of related tumor entities and synoptic comparison of general aspects.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2026Review
- Comprehensive comparison of salivary gland and cutaneous adnexal tumors: analogous versus discrepant clinical, terminological, histological, and molecular features : Part I.: Basic anatomy, overlapping topography, first series of related tumor entities.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2026Review
- Emerging concepts in salivary tumor pathology: lessons learned from overlaps with non-salivary organs.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2026Article
- Malignant transformation of Warthin's tumor into squamous cell carcinoma: A case report.Oncology letters · 2022Article
- Response to the commentary of Ide et al. "ghost/shadow cell differentiation in salivary gland tumors".Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2020Article
- [Updates on tumours of the salivary glands : 2017 WHO classification].Der Pathologe · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite major discrepancies in basic microscopic anatomy, remarkable similarities are manifest within the wide spectrum of cutaneous adnexal and salivary gland tumors. In this study salivary gland and adnexal tumors were identified and investigated with respect to similarities in histology, terminology and pathogenesis. Histological similarities of certain types of salivary gland tumors relate to eccrine, apocrine and rarely sebaceous (but not trichofollicular) types of adnexal tumors. The most striking similarity was found with salivary gland pleomorphic adenoma and cutaneous mixed tumor. Multistep carcinogenesis starting with intraductal carcinoma, identified in carcinoma ex pleomorphic adenoma is identical to that found in cutaneous carcinoma ex spiradenoma. Further histological and terminological similarities are shown for mucinous and mucoepidermoid carcinoma, for lymphadenoma and lymphoepithelial carcinoma, for sebaceous adenoma and carcinoma, for adenoid-cystic carcinoma, as well as for salivary gland basal cell adenoma versus cutaneous spiradenoma. Manifest diagnostic problems related to histologically similar salivary gland and adnexal tumors are rare and are topographically limited to the parotid and oral areas.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.