Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25103266›Full record

ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2014

A prospective longitudinal study of retinal structure and function in achromatopsia.

Jonathan Aboshiha, Adam M Dubis, Jill Cowing, Rachel T A Fahy, Venki Sundaram, James W Bainbridge, Robin R Ali, Alfredo Dubra, Marko Nardini, Andrew R Webster and 4 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed, 87 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Observational
  4. CNGA3-Related Achromatopsia: A 10-Year Follow-Up.Journal of vitreoretinal diseases · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Clinical and genetic features ofFrontiers in medicine · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Gene Therapy for Achromatopsia.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Jonathan AboshihaUCL Institute of Ophthalmology, University College London, London, United Kingdom Moorfields Eye Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Adam M DubisUCL Institute of Ophthalmology, University College London, London, United Kingdom Moorfields Eye Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Jill CowingUCL Institute of Ophthalmology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Rachel T A FahyUCL Institute of Ophthalmology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Venki SundaramMoorfields Eye Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
James W BainbridgeUCL Institute of Ophthalmology, University College London, London, United Kingdom Moorfields Eye Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Robin R AliUCL Institute of Ophthalmology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Alfredo DubraDepartment of Ophthalmology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States Department of Biophysics, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States.
Marko NardiniDepartment of Psychology, Durham University, Durham, United Kingdom.
Andrew R WebsterUCL Institute of Ophthalmology, University College London, London, United Kingdom Moorfields Eye Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Anthony T MooreUCL Institute of Ophthalmology, University College London, London, United Kingdom Moorfields Eye Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Gary RubinUCL Institute of Ophthalmology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Joseph CarrollDepartment of Ophthalmology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States Department of Biophysics, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States Department of Cell Biology, Neurobiology, and Anatomy, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States.
Michel MichaelidesUCL Institute of Ophthalmology, University College London, London, United Kingdom Moorfields Eye Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
University College London · GBMedical College of Wisconsin · USDurham University · GBMoorfields Eye Hospital · GBMoorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

MORPHOLOGY MODULEP30EY001931 · NEI · MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN · PI BURKE, JANICE M. · 1985 to 2016
$9.8M
Assessing Photoreceptor Structure and Function in Normal and Diseased RetinaeR01EY017607 · NEI · MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN · PI Joseph Carroll · 2008 to 2026
$8.3M
VISION RES LAB: HERPETIC KERATIC, CORE PIGMENT GENES, RETINITIS PIGMENTOSAC06RR016511 · NCRR · MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN · PI DUNN, MICHAEL J · 2002 to 2002
$1.4M
Department of Health NIHR-RP-011-003Medical Research Council MR/K025589/1NCRR NIH HHS C06 RR016511NCRR NIH HHS C06RR016511NEI NIH HHS P30 EY001931NEI NIH HHS P30EY001931NEI NIH HHS R01 EY017607NEI NIH HHS R01EY017607Wellcome Trust 099173/Z/12/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo longitudinally characterize retinal structure and function in achromatopsia (ACHM) in preparation for clinical gene therapy trials.

methodsThirty-eight molecularly confirmed ACHM subjects underwent serial assessments, including spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT), microperimetry, and fundus autofluorescence (FAF). Foveal structure on SD-OCT was graded and compared for evidence of progression, along with serial measurements of foveal total retinal thickness (FTRT) and outer nuclear layer (ONL) thickness. Fundus autofluorescence patterns were characterized and compared over time.

resultsMean follow-up was 19.5 months (age range at baseline, 6-52 years). Only 2 (5%) of 37 subjects demonstrated change in serial foveal SD-OCT scans. There was no statistically significant change over time in FTRT (P = 0.83), ONL thickness (P = 0.27), hyporeflective zone diameter (P = 0.42), visual acuity (P = 0.89), contrast sensitivity (P = 0.22), mean retinal sensitivity (P = 0.84), and fixation stability (P = 0.58). Three distinct FAF patterns were observed (n = 30): central increased FAF (n = 4), normal FAF (n = 11), and well-demarcated reduced FAF (n = 15); with the latter group displaying a slow increase in the area of reduced FAF of 0.03 mm(2) over 19.3 months (P = 0.002).

conclusionsPreviously published cross-sectional studies have described conflicting findings with respect to the age-dependency of progression. This study, which constitutes the largest and longest prospective longitudinal study of ACHM to date, suggests that although ACHM may be progressive, any such progression is slow and subtle in most patients, and does not correlate with age or genotype. We also describe the first serial assessment of FAF, which is highly variable between individuals, even of similar age and genotype.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultChildColor Vision DefectsContrast SensitivityDisease ProgressionFemaleFluorescein AngiographyFollow-Up StudiesFovea CentralisHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRetinaTomography, Optical Coherenceachromatopsiagene therapyoptical coherence tomographyretinal degenerationretinal dystrophy

Identifiers

PMID25103266
PMCPMC4161486
OpenAlexW2170259712

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.