Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25102983›Full record

ArticleDigestive diseases and sciences2014

Effectiveness of telaprevir and boceprevir triple therapy for patients with hepatitis C virus infection in a large integrated care setting.

Jennifer C Price, Rosemary C Murphy, Valentina A Shvachko, Mary Pat Pauly, M Michele Manos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Digestive diseases and sciences, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Hepatitis C in Brazil: lessons learned with boceprevir and telaprevir.Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de Sao Paulo · 2018
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Hepatitis C treatment: where are we now?International journal of general medicine · 2017
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Effectiveness research in the evolving HCV landscape.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2014
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jennifer C PriceDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Rosemary C Murphy
Valentina A Shvachko
Mary Pat Pauly
M Michele Manos

Funding

UCSF Liver Core CenterP30DK026743 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI Holger Willenbring · 1986 to 2026
$30.7M
Mechanisms of effective innate immunity in HCV treatmentU19AI088790 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI RYAN, JAMES C · 2010 to 2014
$3.6M
NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI088790NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK026743
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn 2011, the FDA approved telaprevir (TVR) and boceprevir (BOC) for use with pegylated interferon and ribavirin to treat hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1. We aimed to evaluate the real-world application, tolerability, and effectiveness of TVR- and BOC-based HCV treatment in a large integrated care setting.

methodsWe utilized Northern California Kaiser Permanente Medical Care Program (KPNC) electronic databases and medical records to study the experience of all KPNC patients who initiated TVR or BOC from June 2011 to March 2012.

resultsCompared with the pool of 5,194 treatment-eligible patients, the 352 treatment initiators were more likely to be cirrhotic (24 vs. 10%, p < 0.001) and treatment-experienced (44 vs. 22%, p < 0.001). Among the treatment initiators, 211 received TVR and 141 BOC. Overall, 31% discontinued treatment prematurely; 16% of patients stopped treatment early because of side effects. One patient with cirrhosis died of sepsis during treatment. Premature discontinuation was highest among TVR-treated cirrhotic patients (58%). Sustained virologic response (SVR) was achieved in 55% overall and was similar comparing the TVR (56%)- and BOC (53%)-treated groups. The only independent predictors of treatment failure were cirrhosis at baseline [odds ratio (OR) for SVR 0.44, p = 0.004] and prior partial or null response (OR for SVR 0.57, p = 0.02).

conclusionsIn the initial application of TVR and BOC, patients with cirrhosis and prior treatment failure were prioritized for treatment. In this real-world experience, most patients successfully completed a full treatment course. However, side effect-related premature discontinuations were common, and SVR rates were lower than reported in clinical trials.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAntiviral AgentsDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleGenotypeHepacivirusHepatitis C, ChronicHumansInterferon-alphaMaleMiddle AgedOligopeptidesProlineRetrospective StudiesRibavirinAntiviral AgentsInterferon-alphaN-(3-amino-1-(cyclobutylmethyl)-2,3-dioxopropyl)-3-(2-((((1,1-dimethylethyl)amino)carbonyl)amino)-3,3-dimethyl-1-oxobutyl)-6,6-dimethyl-3-azabicyclo(3.1.0)hexan-2-carboxamideOligopeptidesProlineRibavirinRNA, Viraltelaprevir

Identifiers

PMID25102983
PMCPMC4237658

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.