Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25102287›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2014

Branch migration prevents DNA loss during double-strand break repair.

Julia S P Mawer, David R F Leach

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. DNA Repair and the Stability of the Plant Mitochondrial Genome.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Replication Fork Breakage and Restart in Escherichia coli.Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2018
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Replication Restart in Bacteria.Journal of bacteriology · 2017
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Quantitative genomic analysis of RecA protein binding during DNA double-strand break repair reveals RecBCD action in vivo.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2015
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Julia S P MawerInstitute of Cell Biology, School of Biological Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Kings Buildings, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
David R F LeachInstitute of Cell Biology, School of Biological Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Kings Buildings, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.

Funding

Medical Research Council G0901622
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The repair of DNA double-strand breaks must be accurate to avoid genomic rearrangements that can lead to cell death and disease. This can be accomplished by promoting homologous recombination between correctly aligned sister chromosomes. Here, using a unique system for generating a site-specific DNA double-strand break in one copy of two replicating Escherichia coli sister chromosomes, we analyse the intermediates of sister-sister double-strand break repair. Using two-dimensional agarose gel electrophoresis, we show that when double-strand breaks are formed in the absence of RuvAB, 4-way DNA (Holliday) junctions are accumulated in a RecG-dependent manner, arguing against the long-standing view that the redundancy of RuvAB and RecG is in the resolution of Holliday junctions. Using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, we explain the redundancy by showing that branch migration catalysed by RuvAB and RecG is required for stabilising the intermediates of repair as, when branch migration cannot take place, repair is aborted and DNA is lost at the break locus. We demonstrate that in the repair of correctly aligned sister chromosomes, an unstable early intermediate is stabilised by branch migration. This reliance on branch migration may have evolved to help promote recombination between correctly aligned sister chromosomes to prevent genomic rearrangements.

Indexed as

DNA Breaks, Double-StrandedRecombination, GeneticBacterial ProteinsChromosomes, BacterialDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA, CruciformDNA HelicasesDNA RepairDNA ReplicationEscherichia coliEscherichia coli ProteinsBacterial ProteinsDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA, CruciformDNA HelicasesEscherichia coli ProteinsHolliday junction DNA helicase, E coliRecG protein, E coliRuvB protein, Bacteria

Identifiers

PMID25102287
PMCPMC4125073

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.