Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25101697›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2014

Quantitatively characterizing the ligand binding mechanisms of choline binding protein using Markov state model analysis.

Shuo Gu, Daniel-Adriano Silva, Luming Meng, Alexander Yue, Xuhui Huang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Markov State Models to Elucidate Ligand Binding Mechanism.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2021
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Encounter complexes and hidden poses of kinase-inhibitor binding on the free-energy landscape.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  18. Dynamic graphical models of molecular kinetics.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Shuo GuDepartment of Chemistry, Institute for Advance Study and School of Science, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Clear Water Bay, Kowloon, Hong Kong.
Daniel-Adriano SilvaDepartment of Chemistry, Institute for Advance Study and School of Science, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Clear Water Bay, Kowloon, Hong Kong; Department of Biochemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Luming MengDepartment of Chemistry, Institute for Advance Study and School of Science, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Clear Water Bay, Kowloon, Hong Kong.
Alexander YueDepartment of Chemistry, Institute for Advance Study and School of Science, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Clear Water Bay, Kowloon, Hong Kong.
Xuhui HuangDepartment of Chemistry, Institute for Advance Study and School of Science, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Clear Water Bay, Kowloon, Hong Kong; Division of Biomedical Engineering, Institute for Advance Study and School of Science, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Clear Water Bay, Kowloon, Hong Kong; Center of Systems Biology and Human Health, Institute for Advance Study and School of Science, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Clear Water Bay, Kowloon, Hong Kong.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Protein-ligand recognition plays key roles in many biological processes. One of the most fascinating questions about protein-ligand recognition is to understand its underlying mechanism, which often results from a combination of induced fit and conformational selection. In this study, we have developed a three-pronged approach of Markov State Models, Molecular Dynamics simulations, and flux analysis to determine the contribution of each model. Using this approach, we have quantified the recognition mechanism of the choline binding protein (ChoX) to be ∼90% conformational selection dominant under experimental conditions. This is achieved by recovering all the necessary parameters for the flux analysis in combination with available experimental data. Our results also suggest that ChoX has several metastable conformational states, of which an apo-closed state is dominant, consistent with previous experimental findings. Our methodology holds great potential to be widely applied to understand recognition mechanisms underlining many fundamental biological processes.

Indexed as

Molecular Dynamics SimulationCholineMarkov ChainsMembrane Transport ProteinsProtein BindingProtein ConformationThermodynamicsCholinecholine transporterMembrane Transport Proteins

Identifiers

PMID25101697
PMCPMC4125059

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.