Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25101661›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2014

Cytokine responses to Schistosoma mansoni and Schistosoma haematobium in relation to infection in a co-endemic focus in northern Senegal.

Lynn Meurs, Moustapha Mbow, Nele Boon, Kim Vereecken, Abena Serwaa Amoah, Lucja A Labuda, Tandakha Ndiaye Dièye, Souleymane Mboup, Maria Yazdanbakhsh, Katja Polman

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Prevalence and Clinical Relevance ofOpen journal of epidemiology · 2023
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Schistosoma mansoni PCRClinical and experimental immunology · 2019
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Advances in the Diagnosis of Human Schistosomiasis.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2015
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 6 countries.

Lynn MeursDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium.
Moustapha MbowDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium; Laboratory of Bacteriology and Virology, Aristide Le Dantec Teaching Hospital, Dakar, Senegal; Department of Parasitology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Nele BoonDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium; Laboratory of Biodiversity and Evolutionary Genomics, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Kim VereeckenDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium.
Abena Serwaa AmoahDepartment of Parasitology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands; Department of Parasitology, Noguchi Memorial Institute for Medical Research, University of Ghana, Legon, Accra, Ghana.
Lucja A LabudaDepartment of Parasitology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands; Centre de Recherches Médicales de Lambaréné (CERMEL), Lambaréné, Gabon; Institute of Tropical Medicine, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Tandakha Ndiaye DièyeLaboratory of Bacteriology and Virology, Aristide Le Dantec Teaching Hospital, Dakar, Senegal.
Souleymane MboupLaboratory of Bacteriology and Virology, Aristide Le Dantec Teaching Hospital, Dakar, Senegal.
Maria YazdanbakhshDepartment of Parasitology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Katja PolmanDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium.
Instituut voor Tropische Geneeskunde · BEHôpital Aristide Le Dantec · SNLeiden University Medical Center · NLKU Leuven · BEUniversity of Tübingen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn Africa, many areas are co-endemic for the two major Schistosoma species, S. mansoni and S. haematobium. Epidemiological studies have suggested that host immunological factors may play an important role in co-endemic areas. As yet, little is known about differences in host immune responses and possible immunological interactions between S. mansoni and S. haematobium in humans. The aim of this study was to analyze host cytokine responses to antigens from either species in a population from a co-endemic focus, and relate these to S. mansoni and S. haematobium infection. METHODOLOGY: Whole blood cytokine responses were investigated in a population in the north of Senegal (n = 200). Blood was stimulated for 72 h with schistosomal egg and adult worm antigens of either Schistosoma species. IL-10, IL-5, IFN-γ, TNF-α, and IL-2 production was determined in culture supernatants. A multivariate (i.e. multi-response) approach was used to allow a joint analysis of all cytokines in relation to Schistosoma infection. PRINCIPAL

findingsSchistosoma haematobium egg and worm antigens induced higher cytokine production, suggesting that S. haematobium may be more immunogenic than S. mansoni. However, both infections were strongly associated with similar, modified Th2 cytokine profiles. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: This study is the first to compare S. mansoni and S. haematobium cytokine responses in one population residing in a co-endemic area. These findings are in line with previous epidemiological studies that also suggested S. haematobium egg and worm stages to be more immunogenic than those of S. mansoni.

Indexed as

SchistosomiasisAdolescentAdultAnimalsAntigens, HelminthChildChild, PreschoolCytokinesEndemic DiseasesFemaleHumansMaleSchistosoma haematobiumSchistosoma mansoniSenegalYoung AdultAntigens, HelminthCytokines

Identifiers

PMID25101661
PMCPMC4125161
OpenAlexW2003946552

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.