Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25101660›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Modulation of osteoclastogenesis with macrophage M1- and M2-inducing stimuli.

Sujeeve Jeganathan, Cara Fiorino, Urja Naik, He Song Sun, Rene E Harrison

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Microenvironment of diabetic foot ulcers: Implications for healing and therapeutic strategies.Journal of research in medical sciences : the official journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Frontiers in immunology · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. M1/M2 macrophages and their overlaps - myth or reality?Clinical science (London, England : 1979) · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Identification of Novel Genes for Cell Fusion during Osteoclast Formation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sujeeve JeganathanOntario Cancer Institute and Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Cara FiorinoDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Toronto Scarborough, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Urja NaikDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Toronto Scarborough, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
He Song SunDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Toronto Scarborough, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Rene E HarrisonDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Toronto Scarborough, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
University of Toronto · CAPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre · CAThe Scarborough Hospital · CA

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Macrophages are generated through the differentiation of monocytes in tissues and they have important functions in innate and adaptive immunity. In addition to their roles as phagocytes, macrophages can be further differentiated, in the presence of receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-B ligand (RANKL) and macrophage colony-stimulating factor (M-CSF), into osteoclasts (multinucleated giant cells that are responsible for bone resorption). In this work, we set out to characterize whether various inflammatory stimuli, known to induce macrophage polarization, can alter the type of multinucleated giant cell obtained from RANKL differentiation. Following a four-day differentiation protocol, along with lipopolysaccharide (LPS)/interferon gamma (IFNγ) as one stimulus, and interleukin-4 (IL-4) as the other, three types of multinucleated cells were generated. Using various microscopy techniques (bright field, epifluorescence and scanning electron), functional assays, and western blotting for osteoclast markers, we found that, as expected, RANKL treatment alone resulted in osteoclasts, whereas the addition of LPS/IFNγ to RANKL pre-treated macrophages generated Langhans-type giant cells, while IL-4 led to giant cells resembling foreign body giant cells with osteoclast-like characteristics. Finally, to gain insight into the modulation of osteoclastogenesis, we characterized the formation and morphology of RANKL and LPS/IFNγ-induced multinucleated giant cells.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell DifferentiationCell LineGiant Cells, LanghansInterferon-gammaInterleukin-4LipopolysaccharidesMiceOsteoclastsRANK LigandInterferon-gammaInterleukin-4LipopolysaccharidesRANK LigandTnfsf11 protein, mouse

Identifiers

PMID25101660
PMCPMC4125219
OpenAlexW2007284300

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.