Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25101630›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

16S rRNA gene survey of microbial communities in Winogradsky columns.

Ethan A Rundell, Lois M Banta, Doyle V Ward, Corey D Watts, Bruce Birren, David J Esteban

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Cultivation of Bacteria FromFrontiers in microbiology · 2020
    Article
  8. Microbiomes for All.Frontiers in microbiology · 2020
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ethan A RundellDepartment of Biology, Vassar College, Poughkeepsie, New York, United States of America.
Lois M BantaDepartment of Biology, Williams College, Williamstown, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Doyle V WardGenome Sequencing Center, Broad Institute, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Corey D WattsDepartment of Biology, Williams College, Williamstown, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Bruce BirrenGenome Sequencing Center, Broad Institute, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America.
David J EstebanDepartment of Biology, Vassar College, Poughkeepsie, New York, United States of America.
Broad Institute · USVassar College · USWilliams College · US

Funding

PREDOCTORAL TRAINING PROGRAM IN MICROBIAL PATHOGENESIST32AI007640 · NIAID · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI GOODMAN, ANDREW L · 2000 to 2022
$4.3M
NIAID NIH HHS T32 AI007640
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A Winogradsky column is a clear glass or plastic column filled with enriched sediment. Over time, microbial communities in the sediment grow in a stratified ecosystem with an oxic top layer and anoxic sub-surface layers. Winogradsky columns have been used extensively to demonstrate microbial nutrient cycling and metabolic diversity in undergraduate microbiology labs. In this study, we used high-throughput 16s rRNA gene sequencing to investigate the microbial diversity of Winogradsky columns. Specifically, we tested the impact of sediment source, supplemental cellulose source, and depth within the column, on microbial community structure. We found that the Winogradsky columns were highly diverse communities but are dominated by three phyla: Proteobacteria, Bacteroidetes, and Firmicutes. The community is structured by a founding population dependent on the source of sediment used to prepare the columns and is differentiated by depth within the column. Numerous biomarkers were identified distinguishing sample depth, including Cyanobacteria, Alphaproteobacteria, and Betaproteobacteria as biomarkers of the soil-water interface, and Clostridia as a biomarker of the deepest depth. Supplemental cellulose source impacted community structure but less strongly than depth and sediment source. In columns dominated by Firmicutes, the family Peptococcaceae was the most abundant sulfate reducer, while in columns abundant in Proteobacteria, several Deltaproteobacteria families, including Desulfobacteraceae, were found, showing that different taxonomic groups carry out sulfur cycling in different columns. This study brings this historical method for enrichment culture of chemolithotrophs and other soil bacteria into the modern era of microbiology and demonstrates the potential of the Winogradsky column as a model system for investigating the effect of environmental variables on soil microbial communities.

Indexed as

BiodiversitySoil MicrobiologyBacteroidetesGeologic SedimentsGram-Positive BacteriaProteobacteriaRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID25101630
PMCPMC4125166
OpenAlexW2008611514

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.