Negativity bias and political preferences: a response to commentators.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

1. The Role of Political Ideology and Open-Minded Thinking Style in the (in)Accuracy of Factual Beliefs.Political behavior · 2022
   Article
2. In Search of the Missing Links Between Economic Insecurity and Political Protest: Why Does Neoliberalism Evoke Identity Politics Instead of Class Interests?Frontiers in sociology · 2020
   Review
3. Body odour disgust sensitivity predicts authoritarian attitudes.Royal Society open science · 2018
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  Differences in negativity bias underlie variations in political ideology.2014
• Comment on
  Liberals and conservatives can show similarities in negativity bias.2014
• Comment on
  Emotional attachment security as the origin of liberal-conservative differences in vigilance to negative features of the environment.2014
• Comment on
  The negativity bias: conceptualization, quantification, and individual differences.2014
• Comment on
  Conservatives, liberals, and "the negative".2014
• Comment on
  Context, engagement, and the (multiple) functions of negativity bias.2014
• Comment on
  Not so simple: the multidimensional nature and diverse origins of political ideology.2014
• Comment on
  Is it impolite to discuss cognitive differences between liberals and conservatives?2014
• Comment on
  Negativity bias, emotion targets, and emotion systems.2014
• Comment on
  Disgust, politics, and responses to threat.2014
• Comment on
  Motivation and morality: Insights into political ideology.2014
• Comment on
  The "chicken-and-egg" problem in political neuroscience.2014
• Comment on
  Political infants? Developmental origins of the negativity bias.2014
• Comment on
  Threat bias, not negativity bias, underpins differences in political ideology.2014
• Comment on
  Differences in negativity bias probably underlie variation in attitudes toward change generally, not political ideology specifically.2014
• Comment on
  How encompassing is the effect of negativity bias on political conservatism?2014
• Comment on
  Political ideology is contextually variable and flexible rather than fixed.2014
• Comment on
  Will the real fundamental difference underlying ideology please stand up?2014
• Comment on
  Many behavioral tendencies associated with right-leaning (conservative) political ideologies are malleable and unrelated to negativity.2014
• Comment on
  Individual differences in political ideology are effects of adaptive error management.2014
• Comment on
  The role of negativity bias in political judgment: a cultural neuroscience perspective.2014
• Comment on
  Explaining ideology: two factors are better than one.2014
• Comment on
  Negativity bias and basic values.2014
• Comment on
  The importance of adult life-span perspective in explaining variations in political ideology.2014
• Comment on
  Confounding valence and arousal: What really underlies political orientation?2014
• Comment on
  Facial expression judgments support a socio-relational model, rather than a negativity bias model of political psychology.2014
• Comment on
  Beyond the negative: political attitudes and ideologies strategically manage opportunities, too.2014

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

Indexed as