Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25101204›Full record

ArticleSurgical neurology international2014

Marker-CT assisted surgery using household key ring: A simple substitute to frameless stereotaxy for developing countries.

Sivashanmugam Dhandapani, Harnarayan Singh

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical neurology international, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 93% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sivashanmugam DhandapaniDepartment of Neurosurgery, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Harnarayan SinghDepartment of Neurosurgery, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOperative localization systems such as stereotactic frames and neuronavigation are prohibitively expensive to be of use in many centers in developing countries. Here, we present a modified version of marker-computed tomography (CT) assisted technique using a household key ring, which can be performed in any operative set-up lacking modern amenities. CASE DESCRIPTION: For a patient who presents with left posterior frontal lesion, the approximate entry point for the shortest and perpendicular trajectory to the lesion is marked on the scalp using a household key ring and fixed in place. Helical CT is obtained and reconstruction performed in two planes perpendicular to the ring and mutually perpendicular to each other. Based on the measurements of the lesion in relation to the radiologic pointers of the ring, and the location of the corrected entry point with respect to the center of the ring, the shortest perpendicular depth of approach is determined. Freehand technique perpendicular to the surface at the predetermined entry point and depth is employed for the surgical approach. The advantages of key ring over other markers are its simplicity, conformity to the shape of the head, and paucity of artifacts in CT.

conclusionThe relatively effortless estimation and three-dimensional visual impression renders this method easy enough to be employed anywhere for the operative localization of superficial intracranial lesions both for biopsy as well as resection.

Indexed as

Marker-CTneuronavigationoperative localizationstereotaxy

Identifiers

PMID25101204
PMCPMC4123268
OpenAlexW2001465524

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.