Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25101150›Full record

ArticleHepatology international2014

A randomized, open-label study comparing low-dose clevudine plus adefovir combination therapy with clevudine monotherapy in naïve chronic hepatitis B patients.

Won Young Tak, Jin Mo Yang, Byung Ik Kim, Soon Koo Baik, Gab Jin Cheon, Kwan Soo Byun, Do Young Kim, Byung Chul Yoo

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Hepatology international, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Won Young TakDepartment of Internal Medicine, Kyungpook National University Hospital, Daegu, Republic of Korea.
Jin Mo YangDepartment of Internal Medicine, The Catholic University Medical College St. Vincent's Hospital, Suwon, Republic of Korea.
Byung Ik KimDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kangbook Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Soon Koo BaikDepartment of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju, Republic of Korea.
Gab Jin CheonDepartment of Internal Medicine, GangNeung Asan Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Gangneung, Republic of Korea.
Kwan Soo ByunDepartment of Internal Medicine, Korea University Guro Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Do Young KimDepartment of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Byung Chul YooDepartment of Internal Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Sungkyunkwan University · KRYonsei University · KRGangneung Asan Hospital · KRKorea University Medical Center · KRKyungpook National University Hospital · KRThe Catholic University of Korea St. Vincent's Hospital · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeClevudine 30 mg showed potent antiviral activity with a marked post-treatment antiviral effect. However, long-term treatment with clevudine monotherapy induced resistance and myopathy in some cases. The objective of this study is to evaluate the preliminary efficacy and safety of the combination of clevudine 20 mg and adefovir compared to clevudine monotherapy.

methodsSeventy-four patients were randomized to either a combination of clevudine 20 mg and adefovir or clevudine 20 or 30 mg and were treated for 2 years. The viral kinetics for 24 weeks, virological response [VR; hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA less than 300 copies/ml], and the biochemical response [BR; normal alanine aminotransferase (ALT)] were assessed.

resultsThere was no difference in baseline characteristics among the three groups. Viral kinetics study showed no statistically significant difference among them during 24 weeks. The combination group showed 95 % virological response with a statistically significant difference compared to the clevudine 30 mg (67 %) and 20 mg (71 %) groups (p = 0.0376). Biochemical response rates were similar in all groups (78-94 %). No resistance was reported in the combination group, while 20 % of patients treated with clevudine 30 mg or 20 mg reported resistance during 2 years. Muscle-related symptoms such as myalgia (1 in clevudine 30 mg, 1 in the combination group) and muscle weakness (1 in clevudine 30 mg, 2 in clevudine 20 mg) were reported in five patients (7 %); of these, three patients discontinued the study.

conclusionWe concluded that the combination of clevudine 20 mg and adefovir produced a potent antiviral response together with a good resistance profile compared to clevudine monotherapy at 96 weeks in this pilot study.

Indexed as

AdefovirClevudineCombination therapyHepatitis B virusResistanceViral kinetics

Identifiers

PMID25101150
PMCPMC4116600
OpenAlexW2070320651

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.