Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25101086›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in immunology2014

Expanded Human Blood-Derived γδT Cells Display Potent Antigen-Presentation Functions.

Mohd Wajid A Khan, Stuart M Curbishley, Hung-Chang Chen, Andrew D Thomas, Hanspeter Pircher, Domenico Mavilio, Neil M Steven, Matthias Eberl, Bernhard Moser

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Properties and Roles of γδT Cells inFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Mohd Wajid A KhanInstitute of Infection and Immunity, Cardiff University School of Medicine , Cardiff , UK.
Stuart M CurbishleyNIHR Biomedical Research Unit, Centre for Liver Research, University of Birmingham Medical School , Birmingham , UK.
Hung-Chang ChenInstitute of Infection and Immunity, Cardiff University School of Medicine , Cardiff , UK.
Andrew D ThomasInstitute of Infection and Immunity, Cardiff University School of Medicine , Cardiff , UK.
Hanspeter PircherDepartment of Immunology, Institute of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene, University of Freiburg , Freiburg , Germany.
Domenico MavilioUnit of Clinical and Experimental Immunology, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Rozzano , Milan , Italy ; Department of Medical Biotechnologies and Translational Medicine, University of Milan , Milan , Italy.
Neil M StevenCR-UK Clinical Trials Unit, School of Cancer Sciences, University of Birmingham Medical School , Birmingham , UK.
Matthias EberlInstitute of Infection and Immunity, Cardiff University School of Medicine , Cardiff , UK.
Bernhard MoserInstitute of Infection and Immunity, Cardiff University School of Medicine , Cardiff , UK.
Cardiff University · GBCancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit · GBHumanitas University · ITNIHR Birmingham Liver Biomedical Research Unit · GBUniversity of Freiburg · DE

Funding

Cancer Research UK 13823Medical Research Council MC_PC_13060
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cell-based immunotherapy strategies target tumors directly (via cytolytic effector cells) or aim at mobilizing endogenous anti-tumor immunity. The latter approach includes dendritic cells (DC) most frequently in the form of in vitro cultured peripheral blood monocytes-derived DC. Human blood γδT cells are selective for a single class of non-peptide agonists ("phosphoantigens") and develop into potent antigen-presenting cells (APC), termed γδT-APC within 1-3 days of in vitro culture. Availability of large numbers of γδT-APC would be advantageous for use as a novel cellular vaccine. We here report optimal γδT cell expansion (>10(7) cells/ml blood) when peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) from healthy individuals and melanoma patients were stimulated with zoledronate and then cultured for 14 days in the presence of IL-2 and IL-15, yielding γδT cell cultures of variable purity (77 ± 21 and 56 ± 26%, respectively). They resembled effector memory αβT (TEM) cells and retained full functionality as assessed by in vitro tumor cell killing as well as secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines (IFNγ, TNFα) and cell proliferation in response to stimulation with phosphoantigens. Importantly, day 14 γδT cells expressed numerous APC-related cell surface markers and, in agreement, displayed potent in vitro APC functions. Day 14 γδT cells from PBMC of patients with cancer were equally effective as their counterparts derived from blood of healthy individuals and triggered potent CD8(+) αβT cell responses following processing and cross-presentation of simple (influenza M1) and complex (tuberculin purified protein derivative) protein antigens. Of note, and in clear contrast to peripheral blood γδT cells, the ability of day 14 γδT cells to trigger antigen-specific αβT cell responses did not depend on re-stimulation. We conclude that day 14 γδT cell cultures provide a convenient source of autologous APC for use in immunotherapy of patients with various cancers.

Indexed as

antigen-presentationvaccineαβT cellsγδT cells

Identifiers

PMID25101086
PMCPMC4107971
OpenAlexW2066887868

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.