ReviewFrontiers in psychology2014
Visuo-haptic multisensory object recognition, categorization, and representation.
Review in Frontiers in psychology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
33 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trial
- Brief Encounters with Real Objects Modulate the Medial Parietal But Not Occipitotemporal Cortex.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025Article
- Visuotactile object processing in binocular rivalry: The role of shape congruence, voluntary action, and spatial colocalization.Journal of vision · 2025Article
- Cortical circuits for cross-modal generalization.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Differential effects of task difficulty on target-type switching in haptic foraging: Evidence for increased switching with extreme task demands.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2025Article
- PHONETIC UNDERPINNINGS OF SOUND SYMBOLISM ACROSS MULTIPLE DOMAINS OF MEANING.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Exploring virtual reality object perception following sensory-motor interactions with different visuo-haptic collider properties.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Review
- Early blindness modulates haptic object recognition.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2022Article
- The look and feel of soft are similar across different softness dimensions.Journal of vision · 2021Article
- Functional heterogeneity in the left lateral posterior parietal cortex during visual and haptic crossmodal dot-surface matching.Brain and behavior · 2021Article
- Transfer of Learning from Vision to Touch: A Hybrid Deep Convolutional Neural Network for Visuo-Tactile 3D Object Recognition.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Electrocorticography Evidence of Tactile Responses in Visual Cortices.Brain topography · 2020Article
- Anatomy and white matter connections of the lateral occipital cortex.Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA · 2020Article
- The Functional Tactile Object Recognition Test: A Unidimensional Measure With Excellent Internal Consistency for Haptic Sensing of Real Objects After Stroke.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2020Article
- Adults' spatial scaling: evidence from the haptic domain.Cognitive processing · 2019Article
- Visuo-Haptic Exploration for Multimodal Memory.Frontiers in integrative neuroscience · 2019Article
- Mental Rotation of Digitally-Rendered Haptic Objects.Frontiers in integrative neuroscience · 2019Article
- Neural representation of visual concepts in people born blind.Nature communications · 2018Article
- Preserved Object Weight Processing after Bilateral Lateral Occipital Complex Lesions.Journal of cognitive neuroscience · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Visual and haptic unisensory object processing show many similarities in terms of categorization, recognition, and representation. In this review, we discuss how these similarities contribute to multisensory object processing. In particular, we show that similar unisensory visual and haptic representations lead to a shared multisensory representation underlying both cross-modal object recognition and view-independence. This shared representation suggests a common neural substrate and we review several candidate brain regions, previously thought to be specialized for aspects of visual processing, that are now known also to be involved in analogous haptic tasks. Finally, we lay out the evidence for a model of multisensory object recognition in which top-down and bottom-up pathways to the object-selective lateral occipital complex are modulated by object familiarity and individual differences in object and spatial imagery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.