ArticleFrontiers in behavioral neuroscience2014
Individual differences in response speed and accuracy are associated to specific brain activities of two interacting systems.
Article in Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed.
- "Two sides of the same coin": constant motor learning speeds up, whereas variable motor learning stabilizes, speed-accuracy movements.European journal of applied physiology · 2020Trial
- Human decision-makers terminate evidence accumulation using flexible decision rules.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Combining fast and slow fMRI sampling rates can enhance predictive power in resting-state data.NeuroImage · 2026Article
- Early motor skill acquisition in healthy older adults: brain correlates of the learning process.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2023Article
- Causal Learning through Deliberate Undersampling.Proceedings of machine learning research · 2023Article
- Sex Differences in Cognitive-Motor Dual-Task Training Effects and in Brain Processing of Semi-Elite Basketball Players.Brain sciences · 2023Article
- What do neuroanatomical networks reveal about the ontology of human cognitive abilities?iScience · 2022Article
- The comparison of electroencephalography power and event related potential in success and failure during multitask game.Frontiers in neurorobotics · 2022Article
- Electrophysiological Evidence of Anticipatory Cognitive Control in the Stroop Task.Brain sciences · 2021Article
- Neural Correlates of Motor Skill Learning Are Dependent on Both Age and Task Difficulty.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2021Article
- Pushing to the Limits: What Processes during Cognitive Control are Enhanced by Reaction-Time Feedback?Cerebral cortex communications · 2021Article
- Developmental Changes in ANS Precision Across Grades 1-9: Different Patterns of Accuracy and Reaction Time.Frontiers in psychology · 2021Article
- Pearls and pitfalls in brain functional analysis by event-related potentials: a narrative review by the Italian Psychophysiology and Cognitive Neuroscience Society on methodological limits and clinical reliability-part I.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2020Review
- Now You See One Letter, Now You See Meaningless Symbols: Perceptual and Semantic Hypnotic Suggestions Reduce Stroop Errors Through Different Neurocognitive Mechanisms.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2020Article
- Reduced premovement positivity during the stimulus-response interval precedes errors: Using single-trial and regression ERPs to understand performance deficits in ADHD.Psychophysiology · 2019Article
- Stability and flexibility in cognitive control: Interindividual dynamics and task context processing.PloS one · 2019Article
- The influence of blood phenylalanine levels on neurocognitive function in adult PKU patients.Metabolic brain disease · 2018Article
- Predictions through evidence accumulation over time.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- Individual Differences and Hemispheric Asymmetries for Language and Spatial Attention.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2018Article
- Executive Functions and Performance Variability Measured by Event-Related Potentials to Understand the Neural Bases of Perceptual Decision-Making.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The study investigates the neurocognitive stages involved in the speed-accuracy trade-off (SAT). Contrary to previous approach, we did not manipulate speed and accuracy instructions: participants were required to be fast and accurate in a go/no-go task, and we selected post-hoc the groups based on the subjects' spontaneous behavioral tendency. Based on the reaction times, we selected the fast and slow groups (Speed-groups), and based on the percentage of false alarms, we selected the accurate and inaccurate groups (Accuracy-groups). The two Speed-groups were accuracy-matched, and the two Accuracy-groups were speed-matched. High density electroencephalographic (EEG) and stimulus-locked analyses allowed us to observe group differences both before and after the stimulus onset. Long before the stimulus appearance, the two Speed-groups showed different amplitude of the Bereitschaftspotential (BP), reflecting the activity of the supplementary motor area (SMA); by contrast, the two Accuracy-groups showed different amplitude of the prefrontal negativity (pN), reflecting the activity of the right prefrontal cortex (rPFC). In addition, the post-stimulus event-related potential (ERP) components showed differences between groups: the P1 component was larger in accurate than inaccurate group; the N1 and N2 components were larger in the fast than slow group; the P3 component started earlier and was larger in the fast than slow group. The go minus no-go subtractive wave enhancing go-related processing revealed a differential prefrontal positivity (dpP) that peaked at about 330 ms; the latency and the amplitude of this peak were associated with the speed of the decision process and the efficiency of the stimulus-response mapping, respectively. Overall, data are consistent with the view that speed and accuracy are processed by two interacting but separate neurocognitive systems, with different features in both the anticipation and the response execution phases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.