Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25100940›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2014

Across-frequency behavioral estimates of the contribution of inner and outer hair cell dysfunction to individualized audiometric loss.

Peter T Johannesen, Patricia Pérez-González, Enrique A Lopez-Poveda

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Acoustic Scene-Aware Processing and Auditory Model-Based Compensation Strategies.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Adaptation to Noise in Human Speech Recognition Depends on Noise-Level Statistics and Fast Dynamic-Range Compression.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2020
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Peter T JohannesenAuditory Computation and Psychoacoustics, Instituto de Neurociencias de Castilla y León, University of Salamanca Salamanca, Spain ; Grupo de Audiología, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Salamanca, University of Salamanca Salamanca, Spain.
Patricia Pérez-GonzálezAuditory Computation and Psychoacoustics, Instituto de Neurociencias de Castilla y León, University of Salamanca Salamanca, Spain ; Grupo de Audiología, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Salamanca, University of Salamanca Salamanca, Spain.
Enrique A Lopez-PovedaAuditory Computation and Psychoacoustics, Instituto de Neurociencias de Castilla y León, University of Salamanca Salamanca, Spain ; Grupo de Audiología, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Salamanca, University of Salamanca Salamanca, Spain ; Departamento de Cirugía, Facultad de Medicina, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Salamanca Salamanca, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Identifying the multiple contributors to the audiometric loss of a hearing impaired (HI) listener at a particular frequency is becoming gradually more useful as new treatments are developed. Here, we infer the contribution of inner (IHC) and outer hair cell (OHC) dysfunction to the total audiometric loss in a sample of 68 hearing aid candidates with mild-to-severe sensorineural hearing loss, and for test frequencies of 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 6 kHz. It was assumed that the audiometric loss (HLTOTAL) at each test frequency was due to a combination of cochlear gain loss, or OHC dysfunction (HLOHC), and inefficient IHC processes (HLIHC), all of them in decibels. HLOHC and HLIHC were estimated from cochlear I/O curves inferred psychoacoustically using the temporal masking curve (TMC) method. 325 I/O curves were measured and 59% of them showed a compression threshold (CT). The analysis of these I/O curves suggests that (1) HLOHC and HLIHC account on average for 60-70 and 30-40% of HLTOTAL, respectively; (2) these percentages are roughly constant across frequencies; (3) across-listener variability is large; (4) residual cochlear gain is negatively correlated with hearing loss while residual compression is not correlated with hearing loss. Altogether, the present results support the conclusions from earlier studies and extend them to a wider range of test frequencies and hearing-loss ranges. Twenty-four percent of I/O curves were linear and suggested total cochlear gain loss. The number of linear I/O curves increased gradually with increasing frequency. The remaining 17% I/O curves suggested audiometric losses due mostly to IHC dysfunction and were more frequent at low (≤1 kHz) than at high frequencies. It is argued that in a majority of listeners, hearing loss is due to a common mechanism that concomitantly alters IHC and OHC function and that IHC processes may be more labile in the apex than in the base.

Indexed as

auditory maskingcochlear damagecochlear non-linearityhearing aidhearing impairmenthearing loss

Identifiers

PMID25100940
PMCPMC4108034

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.