Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25100861›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2014

Improved calibration of the human mitochondrial clock using ancient genomes.

Adrien Rieux, Anders Eriksson, Mingkun Li, Benjamin Sobkowiak, Lucy A Weinert, Vera Warmuth, Andres Ruiz-Linares, Andrea Manica, François Balloux

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 126 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Adrien RieuxUCL Genetics Institute, Department of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London, London, United Kingdom a.rieux@ucl.ac.uk f.balloux@ucl.ac.uk.
Anders ErikssonDepartment of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Mingkun LiDepartment of Evolutionary Genetics, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany.
Benjamin SobkowiakUCL Genetics Institute, Department of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Lucy A WeinertUCL Genetics Institute, Department of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London, London, United Kingdom Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Vera WarmuthUCL Genetics Institute, Department of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London, London, United Kingdom Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Andres Ruiz-LinaresUCL Genetics Institute, Department of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Andrea ManicaDepartment of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
François BallouxUCL Genetics Institute, Department of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London, London, United Kingdom a.rieux@ucl.ac.uk f.balloux@ucl.ac.uk.
University College London · GBUniversity of Cambridge · GBMax Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology · DE

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/H005854/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/H008802/1European Research Council 260801
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reliable estimates of the rate at which DNA accumulates mutations (the substitution rate) are crucial for our understanding of the evolution and past demography of virtually any species. In humans, there are considerable uncertainties around these rates, with substantial variation among recent published estimates. Substitution rates have traditionally been estimated by associating dated events to the root (e.g., the divergence between humans and chimpanzees) or to internal nodes in a phylogenetic tree (e.g., first entry into the Americas). The recent availability of ancient mitochondrial DNA sequences allows for a more direct calibration by assigning the age of the sequenced samples to the tips within the human phylogenetic tree. But studies also vary greatly in the methodology employed and in the sequence panels analyzed, making it difficult to tease apart the causes for the differences between previous estimates. To clarify this issue, we compiled a comprehensive data set of 350 ancient and modern human complete mitochondrial DNA genomes, among which 146 were generated for the purpose of this study and estimated substitution rates using calibrations based both on dated nodes and tips. Our results demonstrate that, for the same data set, estimates based on individual dated tips are far more consistent with each other than those based on nodes and should thus be considered as more reliable.

Indexed as

Amino Acid SubstitutionGenome, MitochondrialAnimalsBayes TheoremCalibrationComputational BiologyEvolution, MolecularGenome, HumanHumansMutation RatePhylogenyancient genomesBayesian phylogenetic inferencecalibration strategydivergence timeshumanmitochondrial substitution ratesmolecular clock

Identifiers

PMID25100861
PMCPMC4166928
OpenAlexW2125836299

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.