Neural systems involved in moral judgment and moral action.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Integrating the Teaching and Assessment of Moral Reasoning into Undergraduate Medical Education to Advance Health Equity.Medical science educator · 2024
   Article
2. Neural underpinnings of morality judgment and moral aesthetic judgment.Scientific reports · 2021
   Article
3. The Role of Intuition in Risk/Benefit Decision-Making in Human Subjects Research.Accountability in research · 2017
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  The Good, the bad, and the just: justice sensitivity predicts neural response during moral evaluation of actions performed by others.2014

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as