Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25100487›Full record

ArticleKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2014

No difference in gait between posterior cruciate retention and the posterior stabilized design after total knee arthroplasty.

Lennard G H van den Boom, Jan P K Halbertsma, Jos J A M van Raaij, Reinoud W Brouwer, Sjoerd K Bulstra, Inge van den Akker-Scheek

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Posterior-stabilized versus cruciate-retained implants for total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of clinical trials.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2019
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Cruciate-substituting and posterior-stabilised total knee arthroplasties had similar gait patterns in the short term.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Slow gait speed after bilateral total knee arthroplasty is associated with suboptimal improvement of knee biomechanics.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2018
    Article
  12. Deficits in functional performance and gait one year after total knee arthroplasty despite improved self-reported function.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2017
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Clinical outcome after total knee replacement.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2015
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lennard G H van den BoomDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, TweeSteden Hospital, Dr Deelenlaan 5, 5042 AD, Tilburg, The Netherlands, lvdboom@hotmail.com.
Jan P K Halbertsma
Jos J A M van Raaij
Reinoud W Brouwer
Sjoerd K Bulstra
Inge van den Akker-Scheek

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIn the present study, knee joint kinematics (e.g. knee flexion/extension) and kinetics (e.g. knee flexion moments) are assessed after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) between patients implanted with either a unilateral posterior stabilized (PS) and a posterior cruciate-retaining (PCR) design. It was hypothesized that maximum knee flexion during the loading response of the stance phase is greater in patients implanted with a PS design than in patients with a PCR design. Secondarily, it was hypothesized that patients with a PS design show decreased knee flexion moments during loading, compared with patients implanted with a PCR design.

methodsThis study examined two groups of TKA patients: one group (n = 12) with a PS design in which the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) was sacrificed and the other (n = 9) with a PCR design. Gait analysis was used in level walking before and 6-9 months after surgery, to assess knee joint kinematics and kinetics during the loading response of the stance phase.

resultsNo significant differences in maximum knee flexion between the two groups were found during the loading response of the stance phase. No significant differences in knee flexion moments were found either. Although in both groups knee flexion moments increased postoperatively, this was not statistically significant. In the contralateral (nonimplanted) knees, all mean knee flexion moments decreased postoperatively for both groups, yet this was not significant.

conclusionsThe present gait analysis study showed no differences in kinematics and kinetics between the PS and the PCR TKP design. This might suggest that surgeons do not necessarily need to substitute the PCL by a PS design during TKA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prospective comparative study, Level II.

Indexed as

GaitAgedAged, 80 and overArthroplasty, Replacement, KneeBiomechanical PhenomenaFemaleHumansKnee JointMaleMiddle AgedOsteoarthritis, KneePosterior Cruciate LigamentProspective Studies

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.