Trial reportPsychological research2015
Mood states influence cognitive control: the case of conflict adaptation.
Trial report in Psychological research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.
- Transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation (tVNS) enhances conflict-triggered adjustment of cognitive control.Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience · 2018Trial
- γ-Aminobutyric acid (GABA) administration improves action selection processes: a randomised controlled trial.Scientific reports · 2015Trial
- Parsing the contributions of negative affect vs. aversive motivation to cognitive control: an experimental investigation.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2023Article
- On the reliability of behavioral measures of cognitive control: retest reliability of task-inhibition effect, task-preparation effect, Stroop-like interference, and conflict adaptation effect.Psychological research · 2022Article
- Modulation of Conflict Processing by Reappraisal: An Experimental Investigation.Brain sciences · 2022Article
- Conflict monitoring and adaptation to affective stimuli as a function of ageing.Cognitive processing · 2021Article
- Revisiting positive affect and reward influences on cognitive control.Current opinion in behavioral sciences · 2021Article
- Brain functional connectivity dynamics at rest in the aftermath of affective and cognitive challenges.Human brain mapping · 2021Article
- Mood state and conflict adaptation: an update and a diffusion model analysis.Psychological research · 2021Article
- Exploring Neural Mechanisms Related to Cognitive Control, Reward, and Affect in Eating Disorders: A Narrative Review of FMRI Studies.Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment · 2021Review
- Intermodal Priming of Cognitive Conflict? A Failed Replication of Mager et al. (2009).Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2021Article
- The face of control: Corrugator supercilii tracks aversive conflict signals in the service of adaptive cognitive control.Psychophysiology · 2020Article
- Conflict monitoring and the affective-signaling hypothesis-An integrative review.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2020Review
- Monitoring and control in multitasking.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2019Review
- Putting a stereotype to the test: The case of gender differences in multitasking costs in task-switching and dual-task situations.PloS one · 2019Article
- A sequential trial effect based on the motor interference effect from dangerous objects: An ERP study.Brain and behavior · 2018Article
- Conflict and disfluency as aversive signals: context-specific processing adjustments are modulated by affective location associations.Psychological research · 2018Article
- Shifts in target modality cause attentional reset: Evidence from sequential modulation of crossmodal congruency effects.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2016Article
- Emotional and Nonemotional Conflict Processing in Pediatric and Adult Anxiety Disorders.Journal of child and adolescent psychopharmacology · 2015Article
- No pain, no gain: the affective valence of congruency conditions changes following a successful response.Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Conflict adaptation can be measured by the "congruency sequence effect", denoting the reduction of congruency effects after incongruent trials (where response conflict occurs) relative to congruent trials (without response conflict). Recently, it has been reported that conflict adaptation is larger in negative mood than in positive mood (van Steenbergen et al., Psychological Science 21:1629-1634, 2010). We conducted two experiments further investigating this important finding. Two different interference paradigms were applied to measure conflict adaptation: Experiment 1 was a Flanker task, Experiment 2 was a Stroop-like task. To get as pure a measure of conflict adaptation as possible, we minimized the influence of trial-to-trial priming effects by excluding all kinds of stimulus repetitions. Mood states were induced by presenting film clips with emotional content prior to the interference task. Three mood states were manipulated between subjects: amused, anxious, and sad. Across both interference paradigms, we consistently found conflict adaptation in negative, but not in positive mood. Taken together with van Steenbergen et al. (Psychological Science 21:1629-1634, 2010) findings, the results suggest that the negative-mood-triggered increase in conflict adaptation is a general phenomenon that occurs independently of the particular mood-induction procedure and interference paradigm involved.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.