ArticlePloS one2014
The conditioned place preference test for assessing welfare consequences and potential refinements in a mouse bladder cancer model.
Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 56 citations in OpenAlex.
- The OBSERVE guidelines provide refinement criteria for rodent oncology models.Nature protocols · 2024Article
- OBSERVE: guidelines for the refinement of rodent cancer models.Nature protocols · 2024Review
- Article
- Welfare Assessment, End-Point Refinement and the Effects of Non-Aversive Handling in C57BL/6 Mice with Lewis Lung Cancer.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021Article
- The Extract ofPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Neuroethics and Animals: Report and Recommendations From the University of Pennsylvania Animal Research Neuroethics Workshop.ILAR journal · 2021Article
- Behavioral and neurophysiological evidence suggests affective pain experience in octopus.iScience · 2021Article
- Are changes in behavior of fast-growing broilers with slight gait impairment (GS0-2) related to pain?Poultry science · 2021Article
- Behavioral Methods for Severity Assessment.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2020Review
- Animal Models of Cancer-Related Pain: Current Perspectives in Translation.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2020Review
- Ethical and IACUC Considerations Regarding Analgesia and Pain Management in Laboratory Rodents.Comparative medicine · 2019Article
- A Review of Pain Assessment Methods in Laboratory Rodents.Comparative medicine · 2019Review
- Core Outcome Measures in Preclinical Assessment of Candidate Analgesics.Pharmacological reviews · 2019Review
- Article
- Analgesics promote welfare and sustain tumour growth in orthotopic 4T1 and B16 mouse cancer models.Laboratory animals · 2018Article
- Development of a murine intravesical orthotopic human bladder cancer (mio-hBC) model.American journal of clinical and experimental urology · 2018Article
- Basic/Translational Development of Forthcoming Opioid- and Nonopioid-Targeted Pain Therapeutics.Anesthesia and analgesia · 2017Review
- Real-time application of the Rat Grimace Scale as a welfare refinement in laboratory rats.Scientific reports · 2016Article
- Meloxicam prevents COX-2-mediated post-surgical inflammation but not pain following laparotomy in mice.European journal of pain (London, England) · 2016Article
- Welfare Assessment following Heterotopic or Orthotopic Inoculation of Bladder Cancer in C57BL/6 Mice.PloS one · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Most pre-clinical analgesic efficacy assays still involve nociceptive testing in rodents. This is despite concerns as to the relevance of these tests for evaluating the pain-preventative properties of drugs. More appropriate methods would target pain rather than nociception, but these are currently not available, so it remains unknown whether animal pain equates to the negatively affective and subjective/emotional state it causes in humans. Mouse cancer models are common despite the likelihood of substantial pain. We used Conditioned Place Preference (CPP) testing, assessments of thermal hyperalgesia and behaviour to determine the likelihood that MBT-2 bladder cancer impacts negatively on mouse welfare, such as by causing pain. There was no CPP to saline, but morphine preference in tumour bearing mice exceeded that seen in tumour-free controls. This occurred up to 10 days before the study end-point alongside reduced body weight, development of hyperalgesia and behaviour changes. These effects indicated mice experienced a negative welfare state caused by malaise (if not pain) before euthanasia. Due to the complexity of the assessments needed to demonstrate this, it is unlikely that this approach could be used for routine welfare assessment on a study-by-study basis. However, our results show mice in sufficiently similar studies are likely to benefit from more intensive severity assessment and re-evaluation of end-points with a view to implementing appropriate refinements. In this particular case, a refinement would have been to have euthanased mice at least 7 days earlier or possibly by provision of end-stage pain relief. CPP testing was found to be a helpful method to investigate the responses of mice to analgesics, possibly on a subjective level. These findings and those of other recent studies show it could be a valuable method of screening candidate analgesics for efficacy against cancer pain and possibly other pain or disease models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.